From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Are we still using Gobby? Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:57:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87obbgps3u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k3m43kfp.fsf@karetnikov.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlKfU-0001JJ-Bx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:03:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlKfT-0003j8-G5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:03:00 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:54418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlKfT-0003j3-9t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:02:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k3m43kfp.fsf@karetnikov.org> (Nikita Karetnikov's message of "Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:34:34 +0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nikita Karetnikov Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Nikita Karetnikov skribis: > I've noticed that the TASKS file is a bit outdated. Are we still using > it? I had not connected in a while, but it=E2=80=99s still useful, I think. I = find it annoying that it=E2=80=99s not public, though. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99.