From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: MIPS64/N64 support Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:55:53 +0400 Message-ID: <87ob79e5eu.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <877ge3c8lf.fsf@karetnikov.org> <874n96qed3.fsf@gnu.org> <878uyfiwr1.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87siwniwka.fsf@gnu.org> <8738onkyi9.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bo3asfx6.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87fvsmgtsm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwmuhtb3.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001070942.GV1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87li2dv3bz.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001080318.GW1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQvfi-0003Dp-K3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 04:51:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQvfh-00087o-FN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 04:51:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131001080318.GW1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22?= =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Batlle i Rossell"'s message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:03:18 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Batlle i Rossell Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > In fact I was reluctant to raise again the ext4 topic ;) But I think 3.5.= 3 has a > broken readdir() syscall in ext4. I think it's not a problem of kernel op= tions > active. You simply have to avoid using ext4 (or even ext3, I can't recall= ). In the past, I was using EXT3 with CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23, and there were problems with OOM Killer. That was fixed by switching to CONFIG_EXT3_FS. I=E2=80=99ve recently tried to compile several versions of Linux-libre. I = used =E2=80=98/proc/config.gz=E2=80=99 but changed the mentioned options. Whene= ver I tried, I was getting multiple warnings, =E2=80=9Ca variable is defined but is not = used=E2=80=9D or something like that. I can=E2=80=99t remember the last time when I configured a kernel myself. So I=E2=80=99m not sure whether such warnings = are tolerable or not. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSSo4dAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38is8P/1A1H+wbeOs2s2cEwnqGvB8E 3VRzQuetShe4bEvuqIDUFp2sOYEVykKcMfaWnd0wJjMj4qrk4D4qHEfbpPZMSMt8 4luuhXAns/fEXngkFo9wsfUA0up2oW+Iblq+mu8K1MO6ZmN/M5vC1E6dpU3r6Tz7 /FgLiN+IGvxwtU01aPsSVgj1fSfrpL5R5CyyW1Dy57jYQtZkhgokgN04kACwuMJe rXHuYlimhwcJtqFPXNuaNA3ELrjVVQ/9seO7aZnjuBgHwRVTTi1PKazqCKbGAFNc 7Uufix6KbILbZNo5Es5z8Raln9eP4AvJPBvVcrwgFGnhVBf9Jhw0OjhYPPuXKX6F NPQStfTfs8a6RjhqtxKjnUwGbkD5/SUjG0vUvZGcCcZcYUGV2svmGYiKTi0622Lt pVHC6x8UKYu+jDkrh1/5SAR4YGzP4rWPDlJz9cikatJ48ez+pqsDZh2BRNlLrbej iYDNmYnbI4q9VlWr30zkT6OLy5m494K0uu4jPmCC9/Bs7KC21wliRn5VP5X6xaua Jm3V3q+AzYAa1wKTRSduHOZstarrE0BAIQkq/ztzqjtLZZdqLILy21aFrYfP6PS0 Bb3z63gLGBflXZeWbxtV6JVOcv/LvlAMpM7j1gbM0rvIIrj8MNYkVf33EC/xt96U +HQL4AvquKyxhFlohEiV =p91g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--