From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libsodium
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:44:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87oaxfu9ge.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zjh0tsfu.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20140626050933.GA778@intra>
	<87lhsjew0r.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51455)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1X092O-0005eg-WE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:44:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1X092J-0005cs-02
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:44:24 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:46901)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1X092I-0005cg-PP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:44:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87lhsjew0r.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	(David Thompson's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:43:32 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes:
>
>> So we already have the crypto modules: nettle, gnupg, cyptsetup and mcry=
pt.
>> And now we have crypto...
>>
>
> Yes, I know.  I think we could move those package specific modules into
> the crypto module at a later time to clean it up.

Yes, that may be a good idea (except perhaps for cryptsetup, which
rather belongs in linux.scm, as it=E2=80=99s Linux-specific.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.