From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:05:56 +0400 Message-ID: <87oauxy8xn.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <87ha6jkyv8.fsf@karetnikov.org> <877g7epico.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqf8prau.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ha6blwii.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2gznysk.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87vbuqvpsc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha62dtmh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87vbuhbnn8.fsf@gnu.org> <87ioqe2tdg.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bnw6yxql.fsf@gnu.org> <871twmo25m.fsf@karetnikov.org> <874n1haa47.fsf@gnu.org> <87r447t75q.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87r4461xrj.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaz9i3lg.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87tx90z0rf.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha4ws6za.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87a9aoqg4p.fsf@gnu.org> <87k35ln358.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOwDb-0005S0-B8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:06:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOwDV-0003Nk-7i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:06:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k35ln358.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:06:27 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > BTW, I=E2=80=99ve been traveling lately, and I=E2=80=99ve really missed = =E2=80=98guix > prefetch=E2=80=99. Heh, that was the motivation. > So if you have spare time to pour into it, or if someone else wants to > take it over, that=E2=80=99d be nice! I doubt so, unfortunately. So please do take it over if you can. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBj9IAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38fukP/jiT3vvn6FqkmjwcdT6tgGZw ZBEIg5eURH9Vldqk6KSwkcG8b7me75wtOPIp0jwHdZGEJ+oS0uLTD1dT4BZAav2i sjEGQkGxpUAJewDf03Ly+uHawZ9IS4RMHPAPso3i6CcqIWeYasoCZUuAyEfLdTHN up42L0hCLAeEumitbCkgJi2CmTqoDyBilnhoYC2f6GfLX9w1OOvajW2VavsCcC+2 m1eq2kxco4NxOQJH4R9o01FqLORDFRQlaXhZy9Rl+ePh8No+CkotwTaCtALdZJdp vXl0ixo92Go5bZGbwvI2tPEeJ+NYEbGvBqJ2KNOrPCSGCLKxKlNwNd6r6fqJeX6y NUTqMBKKWCcRGrR6LwqqOfwJH7Aqgz28dAEKm+Ojjl9aalxATxhrlstGKLr/1Gft 7ITkqYTMrfMGx1ypihwNAT1kMmXmDZ5DeaMV7spFPi6PBa/9Gh8O558Zd0RQBFUS hezy7tjY3YoBq0nBdnaDzvfOKgqPiLHFUp2ER6JzzDKGLxsZPH/jfPcXdBk6Ccfg UnIXRMx9Jt5nKdhVH+hpU1rbvDJW7mxW5wtLbv3sya25rQF3ISIspiDkJigu2t+Z WaOK+EzZweWmS3sd6M1VZvXJhXRjhH71HISJIWc4E70JyChA+7Bi8cM/Q5tVc/Zu i3kBrmaJ2oBK5gDTMBbP =squq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--