From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint. Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:40:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87oa9db31k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1459917181-19626-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> <87wpobvssk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqSWj-0006dB-O6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:40:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqSWg-0002VP-Fw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:40:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Eric Bavier's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:57:59 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost Eric Bavier skribis: > On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:13:47 +0300 > Alex Kost wrote: > >> ericbavier@openmailbox.org (2016-04-06 07:32 +0300) wrote: [...] >> > + (license license:gpl2+) ;or FreeType license >> >> Or FreeType? Sorry, what does it mean? If some files are under GPL2+ >> and some under FreeType, then why don't you use a list of licenses? >> > > The license text says to pick one, and I wanted to indicate that in > some way in the absense of more descriptive license operators. You can use =E2=80=98list=E2=80=99 and indicate in a comment above that it= =E2=80=99s up to the recipient to choose one of these two licenses. Ludo=E2=80=99.