From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add mdadm to the installation image. Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:53:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87oa605l0t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160714131306.GA11566@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNi0v-0003Fl-Hw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:53:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNi0q-0002AG-Hu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:53:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160714131306.GA11566@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:13:06 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, Andreas Enge writes: > the hydra replacement comes with two hard disks, which we would like to set > up as a raid10. For this, one needs mdadm. While it can be pulled in during > installation via "guix package -I mdadm", I think it is preferable that it > already be around, the same as cryptsetup, for instance. The attached patch > does this. > > What do you think? I fully agree that mdadm should be directly available. > From eda9d6e5814c0e53f481599d0efd09d5237444d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Andreas Enge > Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:07:49 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] install: Add mdadm to the image. > > * gnu/system/install.scm (installation-os)[packages]: Add mdadm. > --- > gnu/system/install.scm | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > -- Mathieu Lirzin