From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Install gpg2 as gpg
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 22:56:05 +0200
Message-ID: <87oa5mah7e.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160613195538.GA1358@jasmine> <87ziqoezui.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160614135001.GC20115@jasmine> <20160615125300.GB2461@solar>
	<20160615150258.GC27754@jasmine> <871t3xiepx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160618010700.GA28783@jasmine> <87h9cpz35r.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48021)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRQRa-0003lI-Ed
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:56:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRQRW-0004N9-6a
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:56:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9cpz35r.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:03:44 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

[...]

>>> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command.  That the
>>> command is called =E2=80=98gpg2=E2=80=99 is a well-known annoyance, and=
 Werner
>>> recommends not doing that anyway.
>>
>> Is there a consensus on the way forward? Should we apply this patch to
>> gnupg-2.1?
>
> To me it seems the answer is =E2=80=9Cyes=E2=80=9D.  If you want to be su=
re, please
> leave another couple of days before pushing.  :-)
>
>> Is anyone willing to test and maintain patches against gnupg-2.0 (not
>> me)?

I finally did that in commit bc85b127df622575988f8e760f72d608d0900a75.

Now, gnupg@2.0 provides the =E2=80=98gpg=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98gpgv=E2=80=
=99 commands, in addition to
=E2=80=98gpg2=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98gpgv2=E2=80=99 (to ease transition).

Update your aliases and workarounds!

Ludo=E2=80=99.