* ghc 8
@ 2016-09-04 13:51 ng0
2016-09-04 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-04 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hi,
should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
I'm currently packaging darcs, but I can do the version bump
afterwards.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-04 13:51 ghc 8 ng0
@ 2016-09-04 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-05 10:40 ` ng0
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-09-04 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ng0; +Cc: guix-devel
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
Probably a good idea. :-)
This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-04 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-09-05 10:40 ` ng0
2016-09-05 23:16 ` ng0
2016-09-07 9:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-05 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>
>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>
> Probably a good idea. :-)
>
> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>
> Ludo’.
Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
(gnu packages haskell) would break.
For example we have this[0] bug for a current package[1] I am working
on.
Solution A would be to go multiversion, keep ghc7 around for all
packages which do not support ghc8 yet.
Solution B is just update the version and see what breaks on hydra build
of all of haskell.
I'll start this with solution B in a master-ghc8 branch to just take a
look at ghc8 build and see if something fails.
It's contraproductive to my haskell work, but I can't figure out at the
moment why darcs fails in the middle of the build.
[0]: http://bugs.darcs.net/issue2505
[1]: https://gitlab.com/packaging-guix/guix-darcs (mirror)
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-05 10:40 ` ng0
@ 2016-09-05 23:16 ` ng0
2016-09-07 9:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-05 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>>
>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>
>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>
>> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
>> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
> (gnu packages haskell) would break.
> For example we have this[0] bug for a current package[1] I am working
> on.
>
> Solution A would be to go multiversion, keep ghc7 around for all
> packages which do not support ghc8 yet.
> Solution B is just update the version and see what breaks on hydra build
> of all of haskell.
>
> I'll start this with solution B in a master-ghc8 branch to just take a
> look at ghc8 build and see if something fails.
>
> It's contraproductive to my haskell work, but I can't figure out at the
> moment why darcs fails in the middle of the build.
>
> [0]: http://bugs.darcs.net/issue2505
> [1]: https://gitlab.com/packaging-guix/guix-darcs (mirror)
> --
> ng0
> For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
>
I was told haskell users expect to use the latest version always.
https://gitlab.com/packaging-guix/guix-haskell8/commit/24262239da96eeabb0840c178ac6c80792e405c5
this is what I have now, still needs to be debugged.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-05 10:40 ` ng0
2016-09-05 23:16 ` ng0
@ 2016-09-07 9:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-07 10:21 ` ng0
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-09-07 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ng0; +Cc: guix-devel
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>>
>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>
>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>
>> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
>> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
> (gnu packages haskell) would break.
No idea. I suppose we take this route:
1. First you test a sample of ghc-* packages and build them to see if
there’s obvious breakage.
2. If not, we commit the GHC upgrade in a branch and let Hydra build
the branch.
3. We fix package breaks that we notice on the branch.
4. Merge the branch.
How does that sound?
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-07 9:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-09-07 10:21 ` ng0
2016-09-26 20:54 ` ng0
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-07 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>>>
>>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>>
>>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>>
>>> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
>>> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>>>
>>> Ludo’.
>>
>> Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
>> (gnu packages haskell) would break.
>
> No idea. I suppose we take this route:
>
> 1. First you test a sample of ghc-* packages and build them to see if
> there’s obvious breakage.
>
> 2. If not, we commit the GHC upgrade in a branch and let Hydra build
> the branch.
>
> 3. We fix package breaks that we notice on the branch.
>
> 4. Merge the branch.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Ludo’.
Sounds good to me.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ghc 8
2016-09-07 10:21 ` ng0
@ 2016-09-26 20:54 ` ng0
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-26 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1445 bytes --]
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>>>
>>>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>>>
>>>> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
>>>> dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
>>>>
>>>> Ludo’.
>>>
>>> Should this replace current ghc? I don't know how much of our current
>>> (gnu packages haskell) would break.
>>
>> No idea. I suppose we take this route:
>>
>> 1. First you test a sample of ghc-* packages and build them to see if
>> there’s obvious breakage.
>>
>> 2. If not, we commit the GHC upgrade in a branch and let Hydra build
>> the branch.
>>
>> 3. We fix package breaks that we notice on the branch.
>>
>> 4. Merge the branch.
>>
>> How does that sound?
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Sounds good to me.
Dropping this as I need to focus on my bigger projects.
I realize this is better for our in-house haskell experts to pick up and
solve. Feel free to apply and use. If this no longer applies to master
(this is a branch which does not yet include the 1000+ new lines to
haskell.scm), I can send a rebased copy of the patches.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-ghc-ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-7.8.4-Update-to-8.0.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1229 bytes --]
From c96b71f8bd32f7085fb1f774ea677ddfde8fcdc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:57:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: ghc: ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-7.8.4: Update to 8.0.1.
* gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-7.8.4): Update to 8.0.1 and
replace with (ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-8.0.1).
---
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index 87628b5..6e9ddf4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
@@ -50,14 +50,14 @@
#:use-module (gnu packages xml)
#:use-module (gnu packages xorg))
-(define ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-7.8.4
+(define ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-8.0.1
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri
- "https://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.8.4/ghc-7.8.4-x86_64-unknown-linux-deb7.tar.xz")
+ "https://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/8.0.1/ghc-8.0.1-x86_64-deb7-linux.tar.xz")
(sha256
(base32
- "13azsl53xgj20mi1hj9x0xb32vvcvs6cpmvwx6znxhas7blh0bpn"))))
+ "19rh4bpmrjwm75msk706n7zaycnjq1rd1ncf0kh01h2fzafi1a46"))))
(define ghc-bootstrap-i686-7.8.4
(origin
--
2.10.0
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.3: 0002-gnu-ghc-ghc-bootstrap-i386-7.8.4-Update-to-8.0.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1214 bytes --]
From 5c2ed52d447ad56926451a56a36f935a9d7c002f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:09:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: ghc: ghc-bootstrap-i386-7.8.4: Update to 8.0.1.
* gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-bootstrap-i386-7.8.4): Update to 8.0.1 and
replace with (ghc-bootstrap-i386-8.0.1).
---
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index 6e9ddf4..5b9e662 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
@@ -59,14 +59,14 @@
(base32
"19rh4bpmrjwm75msk706n7zaycnjq1rd1ncf0kh01h2fzafi1a46"))))
-(define ghc-bootstrap-i686-7.8.4
+(define ghc-bootstrap-i686-8.0.1
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri
- "https://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.8.4/ghc-7.8.4-i386-unknown-linux-deb7.tar.xz")
+ "https://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/8.0.1/ghc-8.0.1-i386-deb7-linux.tar.xz")
(sha256
(base32
- "0wj5s435j0zgww70bj1d3f6wvnnpzlxwvwcyh2qv4qjq5z8j64kg"))))
+ "0zshnl69jygg0hms38f6fcyf3cbwbmd4dzp27ybby7bkr6gc25xf"))))
;; 43 tests out of 3965 fail.
;;
--
2.10.0
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.4: 0003-gnu-ghc-Update-to-8.0.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3195 bytes --]
From 2c33f126cb18b4ec532888a4ca4974a278d9ce24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:16:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: ghc: Update to 8.0.1.
* gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc): Update to 8.0.1.
---
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index 5b9e662..d629d43 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
(define-public ghc
(package
(name "ghc")
- (version "7.10.2")
+ (version "8.0.1")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
version "/" name "-" version "-src.tar.xz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "1x8m4rp2v7ydnrz6z9g8x7z3x3d3pxhv2pixy7i7hkbqbdsp7kal"))))
+ "1lniqy29djhjkddnailpaqhlqh4ld2mqvb1fxgxw1qqjhz6j1ywh"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
(outputs '("out" "doc"))
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
version "/" name "-" version "-testsuite.tar.xz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "0qp9da9ar87zbyn6wjgacd2ic1vgzbi3cklxnhsmjqyafv9qaj4b"))))))
+ "0lc1vjivkxn01aw3jg2gd7fmqb5pj7a5j987c7pn5r7caqv1cmxw"))))))
(native-inputs
`(("perl" ,perl)
("python" ,python-2) ; for tests (fails with python-3)
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@
;; GHC is built with GHC. Therefore we need bootstrap binaries.
("ghc-binary"
,(if (string-match "x86_64" (or (%current-target-system) (%current-system)))
- ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-7.8.4
- ghc-bootstrap-i686-7.8.4))))
+ ghc-bootstrap-x86_64-8.0.1
+ ghc-bootstrap-i686-8.0.1))))
(arguments
`(#:test-target "test"
;; We get a smaller number of test failures by disabling parallel test
@@ -213,9 +213,9 @@
,(glibc-dynamic-linker)))
(libtinfo-dir
(string-append ghc-bootstrap-prefix
- "/lib/ghc-7.8.4/terminfo-0.4.0.0")))
+ "/lib/ghc-8.0.1/terminfo-0.4.0.0")))
(with-directory-excursion
- (string-append ghc-bootstrap-path "/ghc-7.8.4")
+ (string-append ghc-bootstrap-path "/ghc-8.0.1")
(setenv "CONFIG_SHELL" (which "bash"))
(setenv "LD_LIBRARY_PATH" gmp-lib)
;; The binaries have "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" hardcoded.
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
'configure 'install-bin
(lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
(with-directory-excursion
- (string-append ghc-bootstrap-path "/ghc-7.8.4")
+ (string-append ghc-bootstrap-path "/ghc-8.0.1")
(zero? (system* "make" "install"))))
%standard-phases)))))))
(native-search-paths (list (search-path-specification
--
2.10.0
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.5: 0004-gnu-ghc-Partial-fix-to-terminfo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1368 bytes --]
From 69e8e3ddb131f2919f7a5c3420ac724d5eb5ec6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 17:29:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: ghc: Partial fix to terminfo.
This will be reworked when commited upstream.
---
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index d629d43..fdcb4cb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
"0lc1vjivkxn01aw3jg2gd7fmqb5pj7a5j987c7pn5r7caqv1cmxw"))))))
(native-inputs
`(("perl" ,perl)
+ ("lua" ,lua)
("python" ,python-2) ; for tests (fails with python-3)
("ghostscript" ,ghostscript) ; for tests
("patchelf" ,patchelf)
@@ -213,7 +214,7 @@
,(glibc-dynamic-linker)))
(libtinfo-dir
(string-append ghc-bootstrap-prefix
- "/lib/ghc-8.0.1/terminfo-0.4.0.0")))
+ "/lib/ghc-8.0.1/terminfo-0.4.0.2")))
(with-directory-excursion
(string-append ghc-bootstrap-path "/ghc-8.0.1")
(setenv "CONFIG_SHELL" (which "bash"))
--
2.10.0
[-- Attachment #1.6: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]
--
ng0
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-26 20:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-04 13:51 ghc 8 ng0
2016-09-04 22:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-05 10:40 ` ng0
2016-09-05 23:16 ` ng0
2016-09-07 9:20 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-09-07 10:21 ` ng0
2016-09-26 20:54 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.