From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Writing recipe for Crypto++, and getting build errors
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:11:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87oa2jazmq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1474471440.5872.41.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
	<4a5b1e1e-9889-0859-8d4d-7524212f10ec@uq.edu.au>
	<a067c4fa-9de8-6af1-f759-8de4ce6e2385@uq.edu.au>
	<1474555752.3435.6.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> <87h993nh3w.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1475235345.4466.2.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> <878tu9kv2m.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1476564421.11070.6.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
	<20161015205340.GE14171@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<1476568075.11070.17.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35381)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bw7i2-0007Y2-93
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:12:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bw7hx-0006yo-BC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:12:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1476568075.11070.17.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB> (Adonay Felipe
	Nogueira's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:47:55 -0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> I have good news: The patch suggested by Ludovic does work. :)
>
> I did a test with a simple recipe (because I no longer need to deal with
> zipbomb itself, since I found the tar.gz generated by their repository,
> which luckly isn't a tarbomb).
>
> Now, reverting the patch with `patch -p1 -R`. :)

So the proposed =E2=80=98url-fetch/zipbomb=E2=80=99 is no longer needed, ri=
ght?

Thanks for trying it out.

Ludo=E2=80=99.