From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: New python build system merged
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:47:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87oa0xkucz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <58383346.5090608@crazy-compilers.com>
	<20161126044853.GB15256@jasmine>
	<583BF716.2060009@crazy-compilers.com> <87d1hfd8p8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<583D503D.6050209@crazy-compilers.com> <87k2bm745d.fsf@gnu.org>
	<583DC457.6060200@crazy-compilers.com>
	<87fum9n937.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38137)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cC4I6-00059t-U0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:47:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cC4I2-0007s9-RK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:47:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87fum9n937.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@libertad.pw's message
	of "Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:46:04 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@libertad.pw>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ng0 <ng0@libertad.pw> skribis:

> Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> writes:
>
>> Am 29.11.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>>> Good.  When you fix it (and other failures, if any), we can start a new
>>> evaluation or merge directly in master (the sooner the better!).
>>
>> Done.
>>
>> I'm very glad the new python build system is now in master. Thanks to
>> everybody who helped finishing this!
>>
>> --=20
>> Regards
>> Hartmut Goebel
>>
>> | Hartmut Goebel          | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com               |
>> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
>
> Great job!
>
> So should I fix up all my ~70 or how many there are python
> packages which I've sent in since september to get someone (or
> hopefully multiple someones) to review them?

Please do ping people.  Most likely the patch series fell into the
cracks and only you can remind people of it.

I think Hartmut would be a good candidate to review them, Hartmut is our
Python expert now.  :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.