From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQVny-0004KK-1O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:32:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQVnu-0003Cz-3Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:32:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQVnu-0003Ck-0l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQVnt-0001m6-MN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:32:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27497] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-org-edit-latex. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20170626105252.24062-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <20170628214633.3150-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <0281e55d.AEQAMUGi-eAAAAAAAAAAAAPNhpIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZVJZs@mailjet.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:31:31 +0300 In-Reply-To: <0281e55d.AEQAMUGi-eAAAAAAAAAAAAPNhpIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZVJZs@mailjet.com> (Arun Isaac's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:25:50 +0530") Message-ID: <87o9t7asbg.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27497@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac writes: > Before pushing, I'm slightly modifying the synopsis and description as > follows. I use org-mode and latex regularly, but haven't actually used > this package. So, please let me know if my modification has not altered > the meaning, and the text is still accurate. Once you confirm, I will > push. > > (synopsis "Edit a latex fragment just like editing a src block") > (description "@code{emacs-org-edit-latex} is an extension for org-mode. > It lets you edit a latex fragment in a dedicated buffer just like editing a > src block.") Yes, it's meaningful. But, "(description" must be on separate line, doesn't it? Like in 2482c02f3b23b2490a6647e0717cf8a4ccf3f6a8