From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: cuirass evaluate Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87o9squc3d.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87podbthkk.fsf@gmail.com> <87k23g498e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUyoS-0006Bf-Mf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:19:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUyoP-0005rZ-Gp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:19:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <87k23g498e.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Hi Ludo, > It’s a requirement because the evaluation process has side effects on > the Guile that runs it; for instance, it loads tons of modules in it. Ok thanks for the explanation. I just sent a patch to add minimal error checking on "evaluate" errors. Mathieu