From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcF8p-0000DT-JY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcF8k-0003nm-Lg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcF8k-0003n1-Hx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcF8k-0001xd-7E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple Resent-Message-ID: From: Dave Love References: <87wp6thqjc.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:09:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:16:15 +0200") Message-ID: <87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27850@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=E8s writes: >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/mpi.scm b/gnu/packages/mpi.scm >> index 54fdd35ad..678d7dd88 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/mpi.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/mpi.scm >> @@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ bind processes, and much more.") >> (native-inputs >> `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config) >> ("perl" ,perl))) >> + (outputs '("out" "lib" "debug")) > > This should go to a separate patch. Yes, that's a mistake, and I'd actually forgotten I'd sent the patch. (I detest git.) I have a new version to send, which I'll edit for the nitpicks. >> (arguments >> `(#:configure-flags `("--enable-static" >>=20=20 >> - "--enable-mpi-thread-multiple" > > Should we upgrade our openmpi package instead of doing this? I don't know whether they've fixed all the breakage I knew about in OMPI 2 or whether there's still any penalty from thread-multiple. 1.10 seems fairly safe, but I don't have strong opinions if people think 2 is solid. Apart from ABI incompatibility, I assume it has the usual incompatibilities at the mpirun/MCA level, and that they aren't well documented.