Chris Marusich writes: >> Some udev rules might be enough though. > > That could very well be true! I don't know a lot about how the various > desktop environments like GNOME auto-mount removable storage devices, > but I'd be surprised if you couldn't whip something up with udev rules. Thinking about it, I don't think that would work. I haven't tested the following, but let's consider the Udev rule: (define %automount-udev-rule (udev-rule "90-automount.rules" (string-append "KERNEL=\"sd[a-z][0-9]\", ACTION==\"add\", SUBSYSTEM==\"usb\", " "RUN+=\"/run/current-system/profile/bin/udisksctl mount -b /dev/%k\""))) It would mount the drive as root, not for the current user. It's possible to mount the drives for every one though: (define %automount-udev-rule (udev-rule "90-automount.rules" (string-append "KERNEL=\"sd[a-z][0-9]\", ACTION==\"add\", SUBSYSTEM==\"usb\", " "ENV{UDISKS_FILESYSTEM_SHARED}=\"1\"," "RUN+=\"/run/current-system/profile/bin/udisksctl mount -b /dev/%k\""))) Conclusion: a udev rule might solve part of the problem (auto-mounting) but it does not allow for per-user mount points. In the end, udiskie might be the better option. What do you think? -- Pierre Neidhardt