From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjquw-0005Mk-Rg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjquw-0002N0-3F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjquv-0002Md-W3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjquv-0003gG-L6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#33920] [PATCH] gnu: gauche: Update to 0.9.7 - removed html doc. Resent-Message-ID: References: <875zvbjvxv.fsf@gmail.com> <8709180406da2b2eabffd1b4397a2bf3@riseup.net> <87muof8pyk.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgy14yg2.fsf@gnu.org> <87o98m8961.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1j847h0.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef9ee3xd.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvi9ygdr.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvi9ugup.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgxsvq9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7k07bkn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: Gabriel Hondet In-reply-to: <87a7k07bkn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:31:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87o98gv1qc.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 33920-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Wed 16 Jan 2019 at 18:32 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Your patch does not only change the description but it also removes some > unnecessary code. > > Is there a good reason it was added in the first place or was it simply a mistake? It was a mistake (I first wanted to separate the outputs between doc and out, thus the use of the ~outputs~ parameter in the lambdas; and then I forgot to simplify the code). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5ercJXBcjd3P1FcAMbyBBfZZ1CUFAlw/hnsACgkQMbyBBfZZ 1CXpWQ/8CvKsfP7LUwfJB0ch0JIT9imGZwhgfazPEARWJHlm6DC74tMBltLZQr/k 34+S+JUFnwJvefDqy8Wpx605gzmXeesYE/k8U52yDdKTxwUkL0HTz9mYOYqRpSX+ 39+GwHgSUaKjxJ4hp1ZO3WAv3grMZcWESkq1ADLHX4xSDkD9/ZPbxpdCp+WUcyx0 9MmyTwDuOZnjoAJtdVOI3lB4mkl0AiiDSvfL0s7+fdSLAPMR7n0pwqLFam1AR5wr Y0JjQCaNuUfTwY2mbaYKjtrIv/S8EZkmWOuGaJk8TN178GTH2KUez8v+ieMpwnwC +S3c3ndBYeDwoH/8zed+bLTC2Qby1g9qdys9hpJJ+8c9Z4DxKHTm7DI4ye9DOHj1 g8tA/XD5sD2f8XrTjFHkZVCAGGiCxKgKNizRI2s7ttwHG+8dxq3M38jQSO0BZXPi 0YJyoFofOVL6FvxaygK3Y7ieWDB0ADHLq3xgg6XacLRhaive9h8eo1gvqE44Yzzi U1IDKM0tdpP7tT0807A0OnRAjHZg6faLpW7NQ42e+beR4zkRoTitSW0og6F3b0zc 8ukKJdgZuVq3cRozGMVDuwEZ4OPjt/DRd7IgWulJ7y7hxlWO063YV50qjjf6NHUn hwmZUGybKjmMAYECl7NjZnaL9K0fqM3clIyw3zZWfgU/+kStQRg= =hQ5+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--