From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36335: Is /dev/kvm missing ACLs?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:10:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87o921zuhh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87sgs1c4r0.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9wu4v3l.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87d0izlere.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgs1c4r0.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87v9wu4v3l.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0izlere.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87sgrv16rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgrv16rm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87lfx6l867.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44583)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hlG7T-0007PC-Kt
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:11:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hlG7S-0000YE-RF
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:11:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55929)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hlG7S-0000Xz-Mv
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:11:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hlG7S-00018V-FA
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:11:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36335.B36335.15627786224323@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lfx6l867.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue,
 09 Jul 2019 23:23:28 -0700")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: 36335@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> I am content knowing that on Guix System, the intended way to control
> access to /dev/kvm is by using the "kvm" group.  However, it still
> smells like we may have an ACL-related bug: It seems to be unexpected
> that ACLs are getting set for some devices (e.g., /dev/video0), but not
> for others (e.g., /dev/kvm).
>
> What do you think?

I agree.  I=E2=80=99d like to have a definite answer as to where these come
from; elogind was suspect #1 but I haven=E2=80=99t found anything conclusiv=
e.

Ludo=E2=80=99.