From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkod-0006D2-3o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:46:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkoc-0004ys-29 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:46:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkob-0004yk-Ra for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkob-0005xR-QB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:46:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#38110] [PATCH core-updates v3] gnu: rust: Bootstrap rust@1.29.0 by mrustc@0.9. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20200324125716.756eb1f2@scratchpost.org> References: <20191107222756.20064-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20200315192311.6505-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <877dzf9fas.fsf@devup.no> <20200323222403.36a6ce1f@scratchpost.org> <87o8sm3efs.fsf@devup.no> <20200324125716.756eb1f2@scratchpost.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:45:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8sl24mr.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 38110@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Marius, > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 23:16:07 +0100 > Marius Bakke wrote: > >> > Building rust, I get a texinfo build failure: > >> How are you building Rust? I've only used the Guix package definition >> and did not get as far as actually running the test suite. Do you have >> an updated build script? > > It's failing in texinfo, not in rust. Oh right, sorry for the confusion. > Also, on my laptop, it's not failing in texinfo. So I guess it has > something to do with bayfront or the machines it offloads to. I haven't seen this in the countless times I've built core-updates over the last few months, nor on Berlin. I suspect it has to do with parallelism; can you see if #:parallel-tests? #f makes a difference? You should be able to grab a Texinfo substitute from ci.guix.gnu.org though. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl56HQwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoSrQgAsftWhVugmFh2f3cOjQ8EhnnwuIpV4aCKEyj66Q8DvvePoClZMYCp/r3E Xb6cBLxnaSltd6CMrAOuB3/vEI/ojnyBm2Xc65t2Lf72iXuh1508I7x8IEnBD+wU b9EQlAPYEOZ4r08mHYgctBEdcEFZJPFwufI4mCMwhYXtcpwbEztkbty6d6i/Ui8x F6IW7BrwaTwzth3MjogaUf0Sg9D+EBv+gbXOd2nWAHYzMwISD5R8Koe77pt/v48F 5E4zrR02vh/KETPOU2elKSgvcFwo+DDgKX4jga9mUNf6HHR4dkNJA5unZ5EwuUQs WJrIAZOZHuWPfDC747SI8wfM2irjSA== =Dd/C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--