From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Packaging Jami "progress" Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8s4o4gz.fsf@devup.no> References: <20200406183556.560f8e62@kompiuter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLWSJ-0000SA-Iv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:26:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLWSI-00069u-Dr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:26:43 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:54239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLWSI-00068Q-2M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:26:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200406183556.560f8e62@kompiuter> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan writes: > Hello everybody, > > I recently tested Jami using the latest pjproject version - 2.10 which > was supposed to fix some strange bugs that are present only on Guix, > but it didn't. > https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/jami-packaging/issues/63 > Jami developer - S=C3=A9bastien Blin told me: "Imho the probable issue > is related to our codebase... and this would need some bisect to > understand what's wrong... This can be long and painful" and I'm > currently out of ideas what could cause this bug. Do you have a patch we can use to reproduce this issue on Guix? > My last chance is waiting for core-updates to be merged into master and > maybe something will fix the problem magically. When is > the 1.1.0 release planned? You can easily test the patch on core-updates by simply checking out the branch and apply your patches. Or 'guix pull --branch=3Dcore-updates' if you are testing via a channel. 1.1.0 will be released before the core-updates merge. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl6LdFwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrQlAf+KxDuAChgjEVPGbbWvCgP3YnLy/H43lzPmsuRWuN43DUcpkt8V1B5hmLg CGfW8lKYXVgi5vlOn3SwpcxZE3Dphms0sMh7RzOa0txXb7FVJdpGtSYoKXnhmBpQ pNg3QuNY1ETuK4/Nao0sRX4cDCf+wJxlVH0god1A+6ctDsDPq8wbNteSdRO2A6jf zh+edoE00Z12JsxOiYBKI9+JHLgKTpHo6Cn0MtFSsXm0quWX2HOmO9IAkuc10zNj y0RtxZjBAXqXo6k6Z5JG3NH2v3IxUDQ3HizguEHo7QJ68UIHXKiUMM+5wTre2weL BRjiB2VIDjp7Ltlq2CWZTjj+1jH0xA== =zo0f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--