On 2020-04-27, Simon South wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> With your current layout, parts of the bootloader may be written to the >> same offsets as files in your first partition... > > Yes, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out. > >> You really want to have the loader1 (start sector 64, 2.5MB size) and >> loader2 (start sector 16384, 4MB size) partitions... > > I'm not sure how literally you meant this to be interpreted, but after a > bit of experimentation it seems the most sensible arrangement for now is > just to have a single partition starting at sector 32,768 for the root > filesystem. This is because That also should work fine. > - If real partitions are created for the bootloader stages and the > trusted firmware, U-Boot will fail to start the OS (with "Unrecognized > filesystem type") when it scans for bootable partitions. (It probably > ought to just skip over partitions without a recognizable filesystem, > but it doesn't seem to behave that way.) It's possible to mark the partition as bootable (I think "ESP Boot" or something like that). > - It seems Guix System does not yet support having /boot on a separate > partition and will fail at startup if the store isn't available on the > same filesystem as extlinux.conf. Consequently reserving 112 MB for a > separate boot partition accomplishes nothing. Right; I wouldn't suggest using such a tiny boot partition anyways (I think they suggest a 112MB /boot ?). > At least this way the root filesystem is safe from being overwritten by > the bootloader, and as Guix's support for multiple partitions improves > over time it'll be possible to more closely follow Rockchip's > conventions. Yeah, anything after sector 32768 is, in my opinion, fair game to do whatever you want with. :) >> It would be nice to eventually be able to create installer images for >> aarch64/armhf... > > Yes, absolutely. In the meantime just making available a > minimal-but-complete image for writing to a microSD card would be a big > help to people looking to get started quickly with Guix on the ROCK64. I'm tempted to make armhf and aarch64 one-off images using linux-image-arm64-generic and linux-image-arm-generic kernels, and include instructions for updating the bootloader, to support an arbitrary number of different systems... this should be doable. live well, vagrant