From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id NrdQDg4Sxl+sLAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KJuwCQ4Sxl8vLQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE80A9403A8 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2JQ-0003PO-Nc for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:51:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2JK-0003Nu-I5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:51:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2JK-00053w-Ak for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2JK-000793-9X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44881: glib build fail for armhf Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44881 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 44881-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44881.160681620627391 (code B ref 44881); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 44881) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 09:50:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IP-00077i-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:50:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IN-000778-Lp for 44881@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:50:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2II-0004fA-ET; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:49:58 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:d91d:e880:959c:e46b] (port=50016 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kk2IF-0002N7-GD; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:49:58 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87blfkihvi.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfent5u8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:49:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lfent5u8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:08:31 +0100") Message-ID: <87o8jd3lfh.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44881@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CE80A9403A8 X-Spam-Score: -2.79 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: tDlw80ZQsdPM Hey Ludo, >> This prevents the evaluation of the guix-modular specification, see: >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/19035/log/raw. I disabled the armhf-linux >> system for that specification until this is understood. > > I think we can re-enable it now? Sure, I enabled it again. Maybe we should consider disabling those tests on core-updates then. Thanks, Mathieu