From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6B1yD3c/rmEsVwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 17:51:03 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QDgiC3c/rmFBXAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:51:03 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EE33B36B for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muHCg-00083n-6l for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:51:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muHBi-00070m-Qw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:50:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muHBi-0000FG-Gs for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muHBi-0008SM-FL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#52283] [PATCH 00/10] Tuning packages for CPU micro-architectures Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52283 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 52283@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52283-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52283.163880935232436 (code B ref 52283); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 52283) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2021 16:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35231 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muHAj-0008Qj-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:49:11 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:64976) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1muHAT-0008Q6-Mf for 52283@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:49:00 -0500 IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:E+zjGawaipnmUNjNIVjSKrPwNb1zdoMgy1knxilNoHtuH/Bw9vrFoB11737JYVoqM03I5+rvBEDwex/hHPdOiOEs1NyZMzUO1lHJEGgb1/qA/wHd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,326,1620684000"; d="scan'208";a="400367926" Received: from unknown (HELO ribbon) ([193.50.110.120]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2021 17:48:39 +0100 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20211204203447.15200-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20211204204924.15581-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87czmb1m8a.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 17:48:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87czmb1m8a.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2021 09:37:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87o85tllw8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1638809463; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=iEi6TO3mqxCV7S7u9C+Bt1OGQpRlw69gqr4u6qtTBak=; b=rqmMzObZXjwMP1whEzh1hLUupG0rqkr7YTgE1f1GJ0hl9XSgQoLzUF9y3walfmQ6dnMfYt dn23GEsWGnimzoORhc5w52qRLFqzSa7q6oAYNUZ9tSXjFzXwQpv14flDbn556nIpng1bf1 tHDTn4MrOBWqmVJ4f41i7tGhgDkixwwgNYoH7JBlFruF9PreIfejWAVHIFC7hQB4aJ7ycI AvBGeMRbujAE0ibx0oS5VGMTZeQ0ONFE+Ze42Ospnli+KGSH5d4LYPY4d3YtKwDqVQzcWy 2tCK5A0MF4ycvjD0tYwl/rWB8an3NtKRAd8Vip6uvRI2olXiYyprzgoEWgS17A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638809463; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=T6fUhM4Zkfnl3DOAPRTK+DbOrYvVnCKHaVvbpp+mgxHOjROHEEYB7xCEuuIpCIQbLTfBPK DYz/zjrhsOLH6NKvBE34ILF5gusWV/BxQfO/3O+6YQyNlAlJcYHt8MB4kWYTHrPzO5hZlk ZUAdqJ0wYyTHyPD0kyTKXuUXdqP5U+2bwW14Tq3ucM7/zCJlDIt8IW/AkCY9MImuy1DPQw 2lk69WPzygTRbOSA3gsY82Ohkz7+hUB8RiU4Zra8lRTShg5oA4GpKb3pNe60r+BahPVRPG i93vvTu6mf4z4iSf+wwBU8PQ7lnfIO5ApDILWLDCb8Tm/INtxApGnYV33oCRkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.14 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 08EE33B36B X-Spam-Score: -2.14 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: tByfgmFyJjZd Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > However, when the user is passing a custom cpu name, it might be > incorrect. I think we should check the user input against a list of > valid/supported cpu architectures. BTW, there=E2=80=99s another constraint: the list of valid names depends on= the compiler used. GCC 11 recognizes =E2=80=98x86-64-v[1234]=E2=80=99 for inst= ance, but earlier versions do not. We could hard-code the list of known identifiers for the default GCC, but if users resort to =E2=80=98--with-c-toolchain=E2=80=99 to get a newer = toolchain, they won=E2=80=99t be able to use the newer CPU identifiers. Maybe an acceptable drawback. Ludo=E2=80=99.