From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id GM09MqFxSGQBFAEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 02:34:41 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id lK8zMqFxSGRXrQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 02:34:41 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F3946FBD for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 02:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=mu7Head8; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1682469281; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=intlM04oEYp1XRosqYM29GYDiXuyjR9jpyypSOMUjXY=; b=JhQo0HRMbzeqF0TexHkctCpM8D4GRKmkvySnayNIclppp+8NzcIYJxnvIbwe85eUfRy4Qh CAiiWJbtz2gQa745oQtvzGLyo6ah8gjyUtfR/ei5ZOergNVGx5mhpLwI5COahM+3vFZqGK yH/JhSoJUxogZl3+RUDi2nxGJALurK+fX0CNr29z+/rja/QsT+Z4v7vcZsND2h6ZRb6Gkz CGrJ2t+rflTC63vYCF634D9NkrJJvRvtl/UddlTAf3xx+ZOPnxU05zZj9rhdwF0IRCSp0B 8l77suxZEOtxoXUWZkL8rkg58v3nRlVDLhxxjxwG3pa5km8kbC0Fj8KVn7vr+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=mu7Head8; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1682469281; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mQY4E1sm8ap9IL7gfUKNmK3+Gt620zH4MRzwNtb6HQ95ASUe/HhLJkhL7ZmlFDqHBledXw 3vP/bjFZBAuAcuvZxluhMAa1dIo7QABQBLOTroYxYrLKIqPFawLy+NIgJSfZV7/5UZ29nL ACAd5ln+8Buixdb/PgzCyXz9IlCQB+m55gEHlFaZKT6CFOu7kGTnR8f7NL7GPLyIpaidrK Ti6cDjHpOS+g0LAbPvbyhCDN3fCMPLEuGiy65yCEFm/MksKCm3kDgVKNVAOXh5X6HxQi/M ly7ti/wPhXSnQ9O8++Zn3bd3CTT86ifLknS8fwTgA/eA9fH0R+otz5G/cCwv3Q== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prT6u-0004Qb-7H; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:34:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prT6s-0004QL-EQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:34:14 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prT6g-0004jS-Ku for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:34:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prT6f-0000pP-S8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54986] [PATCH] gnu: mpd: Add support for socket activation. Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54986 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: 54986@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 54986-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54986.16824692063139 (code B ref 54986); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 54986) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2023 00:33:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prT65-0000oZ-P8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:33:25 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:61453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1prT63-0000oL-5E for 54986@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:33:24 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-5ed99ebe076so64540886d6.2 for <54986@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682469197; x=1685061197; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=intlM04oEYp1XRosqYM29GYDiXuyjR9jpyypSOMUjXY=; b=mu7Head8qPjO2mlhgvXHUjXWFJOWSC9cCKDY06Zat68ZZX7iz1loBwABY4YirZgNyj 5pzym8yV/azb/wP9yRelTw2KQf0EUSNDn2FEbewXrhN5lAz4CalllGkCNnCvDGtsSoG1 SBQUjLAHCjn2G36feXqI3FNDlSrxFlMTtMgJjeHng70wmHmJRj1NvpIqxJ2PcBVCZvTj y04RQgKUw47yAgtlslXXecejwVkE6QDkPwOIXX/egmcwlaCa59vLyLJhP8All8BFBAXX 9VTl1kBq+IYwsPqrsybuBZrMmA7r1cl4pBYQyCzPkboLOvns5dcg6Wz6zTYsNaIIkuZm NLeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682469197; x=1685061197; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=intlM04oEYp1XRosqYM29GYDiXuyjR9jpyypSOMUjXY=; b=et5MeXT1Fa08XBndrCHPAC2L9zOOtYYLsQG20auIHeVkCkqY576UyysTDoP16RKVa1 cM/0FwwcjvP7K6JCN8ugHKNjQWDcZEeULWUd4qXTgEP/z4DHQTQLluSv4lqw60M4Dm/l N+oEwfozj1xlYOIyMcuR3o5JkD5oQYHfxyVJPvwzLAkVGK85Q7ql03kpQPiIE8dklwu3 3EYaPh+ymRUchjSmJLHFXIAPn+P3ZNXyU/YKD3NI+NxLZ1aDLLPq2+KaxdwqaHpfx1i+ 3BnCGWUm/u+hAW3z0oxGtKnSOxol+SwkRADNiTVVcUf+bBW1c4zoA7Gk36qIc92YTIHF jF7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dTWThNt0QmNQ0fD2T65Hm+JqZILZO7YSe132p/baLJqUfxakKW /57Pj1kyVcMyn08eS362pMM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YfgH9uWzEBvCSmze4J6xBIhohrNmruU3dIxb5oYhTwpMYi7hsoryw5179/rJL/UgBu/Clz8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:21aa:b0:606:5103:9cc8 with SMTP id t10-20020a05621421aa00b0060651039cc8mr25185182qvc.39.1682469197424; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd ([2607:fad8:4:3::1003]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19-20020a374613000000b0074d02ac1c19sm4749335qka.15.2023.04.25.17.33.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <9d4cc9d3ebb05d2aabf8f06e1890efe9b0b9a849.camel@gmail.com> <684304748f200de9493550d079d59dc8cfe2b002.camel@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:33:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <684304748f200de9493550d079d59dc8cfe2b002.camel@gmail.com> (Liliana Marie Prikler's message of "Sat, 23 Apr 2022 16:25:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87o7nbo52s.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: UNKNOWN X-Migadu-Spam: Yes X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 8.45 X-Spam-Score: 8.45 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 48F3946FBD X-Migadu-Scanner: in3.migadu.com X-Spam: Yes X-TUID: kgOUbX/j6Hdl Hi! Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > * gnu/services/shepherd.scm (): New record type. > (shepherd-endpoint->sexp): New variable. > * doc/guix.texi (Shepherd Services): Document it. Like Ludovic, I'm wondering what duplicating the Shepherd endpoints API in Guix buys us? It sometimes feel a bit contrived to have to work inside the service's gexp expression, but other than that, I think it's good to: 1. Avoid duplication. 2. Keep it as internal/hidden as possible from users. -- Thanks, Maxim