From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6G+yCZzW+WSa4wAAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 15:56:44 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6G+yCZzW+WSa4wAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 15:56:44 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA80F432BA for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:56:43 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=FMbV+DXs; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694095004; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=V6Kt0N8mSA6lYK5xfgFyEftksio5bb6Qj9I6KANVrOk=; b=sWN6RtZDL5KeOkTDOBV8TEENPSVpAkAqV46uzEzDk7KOUGYG9/bhba0nv5k6qOkPL9l/6q dfSZQAC4GjnsbM4H/PrXYmam43wS5U1jMNdIg4fDtW0Bkc/uynCcLmNQefGkp7bIClIadg ne1RTAmpEDbzl7p9p0dA+tFXv2JAK+l+POcmDupQYP9WBSj7GvBd/smdUjaZnsE/1OY+o/ E8Srtncobvg8PRV4cTwH4UAurBv7mO+h08LrfrFZjXkdB6DAeY3jrr6EKBQYPFXeXGSj45 A/jJqkEkMWwSFSWFSa87JLO9fgRtvA1ZeMKr5FxrU7LaM5e5KJ7bjAuCWfP9jA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694095004; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UU7QQXQFqiIgnGKL8z8mlOE3Zb7sfEmibg5+bv+bmx9ITFSQCsr5qEKPJH6SATh3cJN1s8 VcTZdNs5a+2tdwGhfpfwc2SxxGC89rbUBo3h9NUfCD1nWEGjJT1mA+e8q5bgd5OvFSJIqM eItjaabG/cqXtf85dIbHfxxfkBals1e2VLpeFOw6IDqZJEYs0WwklsaVOYsTgvjB/pKMrs RCPXnmF5m+6epw19KOWO65xdI7uFDXyuRPkfO7V40s1NAGyV/7OxPbkETpGosPWZqZDL4J Tr+kzOxsizoiRIRPgXWmD0YMfxOEcmVJodqbOWp9O5TBWKnXu8pmXq1FeVyYDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=FMbV+DXs; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qeEIS-0003oV-TL; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:39:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qeEIR-0003o9-GX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:39:43 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qeEIO-0003GN-Tu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:39:43 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DF7240029 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:39:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1694090376; bh=V6Kt0N8mSA6lYK5xfgFyEftksio5bb6Qj9I6KANVrOk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=FMbV+DXsU785UZI+XIHxnYsNyRX/HI4iVhbRDAB2x8nEAkhBl51/fYpYvfwei54oo dKnoWAo7X/heKkqpYT2KJHW3GnhhaPtgL+xunYOem76kssPTHp5VfZD820eqm7xm+v xqW9KmTfw2TUZTTjXBzVC1vtrfgXfOi/AsnDyx4It8FxIy9iPCmAt8iEdx3jVvqL/y ddBVKI+tTqvkHRGF7Iv/4HeEz3I5m17UnrihOwomonzH+jN+rQZAoWRu9/8dL3S4m2 bQta43uo/l8UR+pnk8UCGq1ncRlboFv9TKKdgPbwggGxHn41bOZwevJ+F6QqUij0xN OqeupQAbJvqiw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RhJj40kb7z6twV; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:39:36 +0200 (CEST) References: <87r0nei8u1.fsf@kitej> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: CI job for lisp-team branch Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:31:39 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87o7iejgxk.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -11.04 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CA80F432BA X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -11.04 X-TUID: 06+jyGjUMdq/ --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 03:47:01PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>=20 >> I commented on IRC but figured I should post to the mailing list. >>=20 >> I tested sbcl@2.3.8 on riscv64-linux and the build failed in the contrib >> section. I see the patch was removed, presumably because it was included >> in the upstream release. When I finish my current build target(s) I'll >> see what needs to be done there. > > Re-adding the patch failed hard when applying the patch. I tested > downgrading sbcl to 2.3.7 and that built everything without any trouble > on riscv64-linux. The patch was a backport from upstream (commit 8704f528f227f587d0e06dfd2f807aeca7a69a71), so it is already in the sources for sbcl 2.3.8. What error do you get when building on riscv64? Maybe we could report it upstream as I have not seen anything about riscv64 fixes in the commit history of sbcl since version 2.3.8. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZPnEhw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+YYwEAnbzF4HM0XDctJ2gEL31zLaGnhZty4j13ezfP 7vt/VFgA/RCBjVBqsLAygFDCxwOTqGW18mqtpoV2j/CXxqdnFmkF =yVAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--