From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2AKANtdLxmUXcwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:59:20 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2AKANtdLxmUXcwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:59:19 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707494359; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bi7hsEYLmdGRhc8D3xbhWgdKq5rIWn+vKTlOH884M7MaZKD50L8sUw4owQXxGxIxzJPvDf ZeYeJrQVKy6iY/31kcg9hdivQGKtoajOe5WVWXk0SxDv07/twMrM3r/62R89n9W9FHOOp4 710b9QwhQdz9hEIjsv0Uomc+CJmCBQQgCNjzT5zAczW3p8b0ZXha8U1wjToDUh2M0h0jVr vpDZJwfAsTrtNl38cborOx+O8wZfph63t6MCicc3x5CWWUe2ctLK94WQN2WXfsOz4NV6J4 AeZGda2NC9SzLdUXNSDUQw6UdEOsZW9jYyrnLsLevqlPcOJiH9RaIIJ6w6nlMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707494359; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=LE7C6WsniSKbrYkvmjEFfQAOAmTCaJ/GebgGuNyfB1U=; b=oc4sb+Q9/KMSeLoiyQiwB2Pnsy9wrc+jBU0wb36kOVyDTac48PS5GynRMi0fhAN4bODYH4 RKW4qZreHgURrzPRcFN7mCBpfdkNLxGwR4gJYPtaP8TMhmP4h5cgupBSyWVkQgg32PVoMq JP/2nD2DWtsXZvjbwC4pRlI+kYkoru94B0ROUx/X5DCAPujO9yeuA5aztyJlxMOHYH6m9s EIETc7MnuXb+MBgIAN/Hb9LArKZVvqzdnTjqWWq9b/BL8U+bmtRoaSruy3xBXnp+mA7gev Xg0G3S8SwPH811Npf7ZxzgQ8IqIh53WzkZEKdupx87ZTSHNX4BHYCVYDE5kjDw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7076A98C for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:59:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYTH1-0008G6-56; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 10:58:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYTGz-0008FO-D8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 10:58:41 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYTGl-0005ZX-51 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 10:58:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [217.155.61.229]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D850B27BBE2; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 418990c7; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:25 +0000 (UTC) References: <87wmrddheu.fsf@cbaines.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches? Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:57:31 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87o7cpd3z4.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.01 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CC7076A98C X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.01 X-TUID: 9g+MGmb6amyY --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Andreas Enge writes: > I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here: > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778 > While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures, > at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do? Long term it would be nice for Guile to segfault less, in the short term though sending the patch again will trigger the data service to try again. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmXGS59fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xf/+RAAmQVYV4GYWaN933yQrpkWPcgL1k8s3wdX 8hF/j8GL/NYgKsMqOSrFYP7ZCvbF798FIbo0QGps6c42+cqabrZEF42vMCKedLwd RcX5YTAWghYU1G5mD8mBzqnFLH+TRJS42fZgvOdGMcU8+5bEjbnLHeMTYoFAYrr+ d9Aya6R6T2Q9ZnLphJwfb18kzzLtgGbMDi4+myNBfg5TizmDNDijoGWXJHX4gbfX fk5VcLIAhWJXfnekXgu+2ID1m6xKQGL4EMjBwgy1lwlhWOAlASd78Jy4KlSiFLdW wFIiXuy5wzgaDpg6yKw7MHdbvcXeso3MCXMUPmOvgPGnX+vw88o6tqYQRnik3CsG vH2268OZcUpYkIbov3/n7WZ2xpEemJnP2lT2uuZZT6MD/0CigCXoW9lXnfI/+DZ1 FpSF50Ccs7RUtTI7/QdfHTYmWtoYbJCxueZqOMkBOvHTvYZBknGQ8KIoocKhucYi xNzfTylNj7YzG3t73hc0V08j9le+KUOgEoTdsvSdnoigaEk1XSyZniE8eZQeMWOX 2BFBndm/xhjO2LM1fBitsGoPtVeuUtgFNjQO0opvMtwmDsEse2UUdYIHfX73ON+o 6SoKHS+CPGMMk2mfCT7s7yo3DH0isrBZsiwA5k9w+s6gGKAFsgPqPneRMR83xWHW vB7pTz7guXc= =Mru6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--