From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0ITUMFi0L2amFwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:53:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0ITUMFi0L2amFwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:53:12 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=WX4JX9uc; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1") ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1714402392; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=bRJZY6xdG1y6fccbYRivNTXe/rtRU0Wgxk9r5ARTJY4=; b=VgGScryLPtHYC7AnWFpok6Ol/dcCraMNREi0IZ5ZOpl4ukf7Xo4Wy+1VTii9h9wKJPsyBz J8CPbOlGbGHB57QmiZxZMYmom+XGvIEnpTz8WQwMGWZgapi5Ztk1cw1YK3GFjllSySyQkj Ubt6Ufl8G5EAoACAbb0USF2huw1hMuoWAKukT2/Y9cK88WsTnLuwF+vguvR5BL10bFnFQT wunA8CCo3N4m3FMFXnmmv5HDr6F1oU1fXh9Hb/eoDWlNvVw+QDuLwBuwHTO4oikczXfhLT LaYUVr2KFs7SLTt8UnDvNsq4PLQRDm50GepJ7+8BUu+cXZzyNMkYZsKmJowXqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=WX4JX9uc; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1") ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1714402392; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; b=cOafBhfkG13yoztLX3iRkVSzoypo4iq5SVNa13hyRDkkrMh/457k12vhg8XMJI65IzxpGO gWU/UOId79WOt60R6T12+TS5Md0+MviT83Pe/VPdostsOTDbCUVcRTRhSAu+g+vQ5Nx0ni +RDRV/R/Im02YYKfazChJ6Wu7heDoRV153GwNmF94hixI7wVgYgFOT2/bt7yfdWEddeWkx EqmXFsrIW1b2rp7UXQpDv8G/slTj8E85W5F3yk8unKpUSst86nLzJPj5IqKZCoA4jOtD0f 3uC3tv7OulrA7Fy4bAQgvWak+OARY/MHZtO6th7OVJeigisgd1iJFZ3tDRpBTA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E093A731 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:53:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1SN0-00005L-Lt; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:52:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1SMy-0008Rc-Dy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:52:40 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1SMv-0007rl-BI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:52:40 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1714402354; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=QwvvwD4j+S2cfWXscmmii6lE7mHfhdscj9lFDAaGqHjlncK13qayrWZCCQvAqdhvgOK+6oe+q4gWz1d5Ks1Ax63OGcvVs0kn7Lu0hfJcUmi15i8y/fd0tm6Dc2W3+lrZXCdwOAKwkKP3gCz437YU/eYnvLIkU6y4CfXOP5YFlgA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1714402354; h=Content-Type:Date:Date:From:From:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=bRJZY6xdG1y6fccbYRivNTXe/rtRU0Wgxk9r5ARTJY4=; b=BumCs7LBKMR9q5mB1HitBSVTA7rRpwVoz1MK1oWGApGwb2JHBMpJoVjenD7KJRBk69LO6NoZ/uOCPSe0PniCiXgiWZNHOVLTzkYoaX4wjqxFj1wOn8gUDGDdXvpg0EZ5PRmgLJRDU9YfT5a1mqkBtkraL/zpTnQEdX4+eo3b40M= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1714402354; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=bRJZY6xdG1y6fccbYRivNTXe/rtRU0Wgxk9r5ARTJY4=; b=WX4JX9uc5Qwri3f1hduDAA40ERsoFqI+xSTGT+mQ4JZwk3pzX9HvslNuZRefvM6U dGcJj/1N45vGccsvAEuMZIKIY5Fr0ZHc6B6yADP+hvJ+CLKFZaQnFeytr+OrnQ5U7xB AyjVgfcnV+rt7CGewjV2aKTJDKdGvdoF3g4qLrQQ= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1714402352798243.23911968969412; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:52:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Wurmus To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Hackathon: fix build errors on the "master" branch. User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 29.3 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:52:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87o79smdaq.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -9.48 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9E093A731 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.48 X-TUID: bhlg3HUkNUkJ Hi Guix, for the past weeks the "master" branch has been in pretty poor state according to ci.guix.gnu.org. It keeps hovering at around 56% progress, which is a far cry from the 80+% we used to have in the old days. A lot of packages are in fact broken. Many more are marked as broken due to a bug affecting ci.guix.gnu.org. It would be a good idea to do a little spring cleaning and go through the dashboard for the master branch and work on fixing builds that are currently broken on x86_64-linux. (Other architectures are in worse state, but fixing x86_64-linux may be something we can actually accomplish.) What do you think? -- Ricardo