From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
Cc: "Josselin Poiret" <dev@jpoiret.xyz>,
"Mathieu Othacehe" <othacehe@gnu.org>,
"Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
"Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" <me@tobias.gr>,
"Florian Pelz" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>,
"Ricardo Wurmus" <rekado@elephly.net>,
71697@debbugs.gnu.org, "Christopher Baines" <guix@cbaines.net>,
"Matthew Trzcinski" <matt@excalamus.com>
Subject: [bug#71697] [PATCH v3 2/2] scripts: lint: Honor package property to exclude checkers.
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:20:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o772eddj.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6dfbj1w.fsf@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 15:28, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could we not instead create a GUIX_LINT_OPTIONS, similar to
>> GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS? Then anyone wishing to universally exclude certain
>> checkers (or disable network checks) on their own system would be free
>> to do so.
>
> That would be a good option to have too, on top of the other one.
Well, I am not convinced it would be helpful. Because if you have:
GUIX_LINT_EXCLUDE=archival,home-page guix lint -L . foobar
is as complicated as:
guix lint -L . -x archival,home-page foobar
And if ones does:
export GUIX_LINT_EXCLUDE=archival
then the checker ’archival’ would be always excluded, i.e., for the
third-party custom packages – that’s what the aim :-) – but also when
the person would contribute to Guix proper – and that’s against our
quality assurance, IMHO.
Somehow, from my point of view, the idea of the patch set is only to
provide a complementary mechanism of “--exclude”. Consider that I am
packaging something for Guix proper and I am bored by some checker
because it takes time, or because the warning annoys me or because it
sends again and again the exact same request to SWH or because whatever
other reasons, then I can just temporarily turn off that checker when
developing and looping over “guix lint”, either via --exclude or either
via the package property. Once the package is ready, I submit it with
all checkers turned on.
Obviously, a third-party channel could use this mechanism to turn off
the checkers. It’s up to them. :-)
Well, maybe the wording of the manual could be tweaked if it does not
capture this idea.
Cheers,
simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-12 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 17:22 [bug#71697] [PATCH] guix: lint: Honor 'no-archival?' package property Simon Tournier
2024-06-21 18:33 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v2] guix: scripts: lint: Honor package property to exclude chercker Simon Tournier
2024-06-21 21:09 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-06-22 14:29 ` MSavoritias
2024-06-22 15:40 ` Simon Tournier
2024-06-24 8:21 ` MSavoritias
2024-06-22 15:27 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v3 1/2] scripts: lint: Add 'dry-run' option Simon Tournier
2024-06-22 15:27 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v3 2/2] scripts: lint: Honor package property to exclude checkers Simon Tournier
2024-06-23 23:51 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-06-25 15:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-06-25 17:14 ` Greg Hogan via Guix-patches
2024-06-26 8:24 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-06-26 19:28 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-06-27 16:38 ` Greg Hogan
2024-06-29 3:12 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-06-30 14:48 ` Dale Mellor
2024-07-01 20:44 ` Maxim Cournoyer
[not found] ` <72a5f3c9d0523b29ed99afd5a551b411f4c0e7f5.camel@rdmp.org>
2024-07-02 1:39 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-07-12 13:36 ` Simon Tournier
2024-07-05 7:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-12 14:16 ` Simon Tournier
2024-07-25 15:19 ` Greg Hogan
2024-07-12 17:20 ` Simon Tournier [this message]
2024-06-23 23:54 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v3 1/2] scripts: lint: Add 'dry-run' option Maxim Cournoyer
2024-07-12 17:22 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v4 " Simon Tournier
2024-07-12 17:22 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: lint: Honor package property to exclude checkers Simon Tournier
2024-07-18 9:19 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v4 1/2] scripts: lint: Add 'dry-run' option Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-18 11:00 ` Simon Tournier
2024-07-19 18:27 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v5 0/3] Add dry-run to guix lint Simon Tournier
2024-07-19 18:38 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v5 1/3] scripts: lint: Add 'dry-run' option Simon Tournier
2024-07-26 2:06 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-07-19 18:38 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v5 2/3] scripts: lint: Honor package property to exclude checkers Simon Tournier
2024-07-19 18:38 ` [bug#71697] [PATCH v5 3/3] scripts: lint: Add hint for checker typo Simon Tournier
2024-07-26 2:26 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o772eddj.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=71697@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=code@greghogan.com \
--cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
--cc=guix@cbaines.net \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=matt@excalamus.com \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=me@tobias.gr \
--cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
--cc=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.