From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: MIPS64/N64 support Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 01:51:28 +0400 Message-ID: <87mwmuhtb3.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <87vc2o4qwc.fsf@gnu.org> <87y57kljro.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87li3dd844.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <87d2opy6qa.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4d577ab.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87zjrswzin.fsf@gnu.org> <87hadygxe8.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87mwnq470w.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5791h9f.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87eh907psx.fsf@gnu.org> <87li37z967.fsf@karetnikov.org> <8761ub143g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3iqa71l.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87k3iqhrh5.fsf@gnu.org> <877ge3c8lf.fsf@karetnikov.org> <874n96qed3.fsf@gnu.org> <878uyfiwr1.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87siwniwka.fsf@gnu.org> <8738onkyi9.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bo3asfx6.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87fvsmgtsm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQlIk-0005kC-KH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:46:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQlIj-00007L-57 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:46:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fvsmgtsm.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:26:17 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Batlle --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Could you try running the statically-linked bash from > =E2=80=98static-binaries.tar.xz=E2=80=99 and see if the same error occurs= ? Perhaps > strace it so we can see where that error comes from. I don=E2=80=99t see anything similar. > Looking at > , > syscalls have different numbers in n64 vs. n32. So I suppose the kernel > needs to be compiled to support the n64 ABI? So, should I try this, or do you have other ideas? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSSfJjAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38sp4P/iutZLEVDiq3zhwj+wgm5T77 SxASpuIFsOORo7CoW/4DCkvsxtE2B/mhwBtyg2IQalbiuD6N80bjHVwV9/CtpXlV JdDsMsrsdiDU8/yFKZ6FB1IXLfeV00pqPpx8xDYA9XZohtTmn6rZbZjxGs3zMRSZ e1JFsd9HpSI1V2KdtirD7ATLqP9knwMUk8sKUS9T66iAo4yWgmDW1Ag8UR4KBXiL Y+o+Crq3pqs6kloVrgl803+zHZ41lXBqwe+1OqRXyyvZtfV6JuRe9ubJ38KjOp89 MZEyzcbsLwsJsLj21cf4HejHD2FJURv9K6avzvacnzRYfYeiADKSF7fya0Xps28G hVDxC1KKOTgCemuHbrLd7/LWEUy/2ahcJnGI8htaR5zaaFjsiavQqWSW2MRCn0WW seIJqjDEUY4lnaR0OlVhM0xVmAoWIiF1d6Ekvk5mRKMLto/KNfdtUp4SHyl8GW5V aSfM7VNE83377rqmV2LcpSxLOJdWcOY+JbSGR27w5jUKGUVK2EtZh1VhYbTG1e2q MwXrG8nHrLxjM3ZUGXn3reWLyG7HeUOCvQmSakhvSM+O0ZnjAiTuhMNoX2XsNQaq Y3WLaHxPaECskxtkxqogHLurtj24+3RU0j3wmk3JCFlQotU4gWGE7t9ILdw7qJ5d agHE1JzgfcE4Q+gPbMfm =zlXq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--