From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:31:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwh4zecr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a9d5m4jq.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <20140305090052.GA12643@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <871tyhm1jo.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <20140305100455.GA13118@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGbm-0002f5-3I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:32:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGbf-0006PM-BI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:31:58 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:45010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGbf-0006PA-4Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:31:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140305100455.GA13118@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:04:55 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > But all this is more an expression of taste than really argumented. So fa= r, > we have no coherent policy on which package goes into which file. Persona= lly, > I tend to regroup several packages into one file. So in the end, feel free > to do as you prefer. Yeah, in this case I=E2=80=99d favor lynx.scm (because of w3m.scm), but per= haps we should have browsers.scm eventually, or maybe web.scm is good enough? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.