From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [GSoC] Package management from Emacs
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:54:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwh3tx5a.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d2i52fvq.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppm2hpna.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87siqxhvxy.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878usoxz6e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87k3c8qkpq.fsf@Jjaro.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46805)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WLVwu-0002JG-7u
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:54:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WLVwp-00020T-Em
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:54:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87k3c8qkpq.fsf@Jjaro.lan> (Grim Schjetne's message of "Thu, 06
	Mar 2014 00:39:13 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Grim Schjetne <gs@schjetne.se>
Cc: Xue Fuqiao <xfq@gnu.org>, guix-devel@gnu.org

Grim Schjetne <gs@schjetne.se> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Xue Fuqiao <xfq@gnu.org> skribis:
>>> `r'
>>>      Refresh the package list (`guix-refresh').  This recomputes the
>>>      package list.
>>
>> Perhaps there should be something that runs =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 =
too (it=E2=80=99s like
>> =E2=80=98apt-get update=E2=80=99)?
>
> Isn't this type of operation usually bound to =E2=80=98g=E2=80=99?

Yes.

> Or perhaps it would be appropriate to have both, where one of them
> also runs =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99?

Probably yes, both =E2=80=98refresh=E2=80=99 (in case something goes wrong)=
 and =E2=80=98pull=E2=80=99.

Ludo=E2=80=99.