From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gnu: Enable gnome-doc-utils tests
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:23:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwc9irnj.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140715214338.GB16482@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message of "Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:43:38 +0200")
John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:59:17PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that ???search-path-specification??? is meant for $PATH-like
> variables that list directories, not files.
>
> That occurred to me too. But what problems does it actually cause?
That we can’t use it for $XML_CATALOG_FILES.
> So I see two solutions:
>
> 1. Patch libxml2 so that it honors a new variable, say
> $XML_CATALOG_DIRECTORIES, which would allow us to use
> ???search-path-specification???.
>
> 2. Augment support for search paths to allow file-based search paths.
>
> (2) may be best in the long run, but it has ramifications in different
> places.
>
>
> (1) seems like a good idea only if upstream can be persuaded to adopt it.
Which is unlikely, given that it’s redundant with $XML_CATALOG_FILES.
> What are the ramifications of (2) ?
There are changes in the build tools, for instance ‘search-path-as-list’
(used by ‘set-path-environment-variable’, used in gnu-build-system.scm)
expects directories, not files. And all this calls things
‘directories’.
This is a change we could schedule for the next core-updates.
WDYT?
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 18:31 [PATCH 1/6] gnu: docbook-xsl update to 1.78.1 John Darrington
2014-07-15 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] gnu: Add docbook-xml version 4.3 and 4.4 John Darrington
2014-07-15 20:49 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] gnu: docbook-xml: Substite remote xml_catalog uris with local ones John Darrington
2014-07-15 20:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] gnu: docbook-xsl write absolute file:// uris in catalogs instead of ./ relative ones John Darrington
2014-07-15 20:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] gnu: Enable gnome-doc-utils tests John Darrington
2014-07-15 20:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 21:43 ` John Darrington
2014-07-16 9:23 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2014-07-16 10:08 ` John Darrington
2014-07-16 14:02 ` bug#18033: Add support for 'search-path-specifications' referring to files Ludovic Courtès
2014-12-27 11:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-12-27 22:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-01-02 23:30 ` Mark H Weaver
2015-01-03 18:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 18:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Tinyproxy: Cleanup xml dependencies John Darrington
2014-07-15 21:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-15 21:11 ` John Darrington
2014-07-15 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] gnu: docbook-xsl update to 1.78.1 Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mwc9irnj.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jmd@gnu.org \
--cc=john@darrington.wattle.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.