From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: gnu: Add HISAT.
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:40:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87mw4kt6kn.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <idjlhk772t8.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87fvae8z7h.fsf@gnu.org> <idj8ug66p3y.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<20150211111501.GA5291@debian>
	<idjpp9gl92i.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44673)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLfxv-000717-Pl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLfxr-0006Cv-O4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:03 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34992)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YLfxr-0006Cr-L3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:40:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <idjpp9gl92i.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's
	message of "Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:14:13 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
> for other architectures than x86_64.  Until then should I just declare
> x86_64 as the only supported architecture?

Probably yes, with a comment pointing to this discussion and possibly
the one with the author(s).

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.