From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add figlet. Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:48:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvxpno42.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87twrzom7t.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRZlK-0002w7-CJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:48:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRZlH-0000Ur-5l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:48:42 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRZlG-0000U5-6A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:48:39 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Steve Sprang Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Steve, > Thanks for the feedback! Here's my 2nd attempt. as others have said on IRC, putting figlet into its own module (for now) because we don’t have one dedicated to “silly command line tools” is probably okay :) The only thing that I’m not entirely happy with is the length of the synopsis, but I’m probably just too picky. Unless someone else has any objections, I think this can be accepted. Thanks! ~~ Ricardo