From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:52:09 -0800 Message-ID: <87mvs25d5l.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87twma65vq.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87bn8i7b7r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLPDg-0003Lb-H7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:52:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLPDc-0003v3-FU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:52:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <87bn8i7b7r.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > I would rather use , > which is likely more stable, and keep the comment about the lack of a > separate license file. > > Otherwise LGTM, thanks! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Okay, I did that, and then also handled Leo's suggestions, and pushed. Thanks! :) - Chris