Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

[Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>]

Albin (2016-05-03 22:24 +0300) wrote:

> Den 2016-05-03 kl. 21:09, skrev Alex Kost:
>> Andreas Enge (2016-05-02 13:38 +0300) wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>>>>> +      (name "redeclipse")
>>>> I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't matter.
>>>
>>> That would be in line with our package naming guidelines: replace everything
>>> that is not [A-Za-z0-9] by a '-'. Do you think we could still rename the
>>> package?
>> 
>> Probably; you are the master of guidelines, so I trust your judge :-)
>> OTOH we also have such packages as 'accountsservice', 'recordmydesktop',
>> 'randomjungle', 'rubberband' and others.  Should they also be renamed to
>> 'accounts-service', 'record-my-desktop', 'random-jungle', 'rubber-band',
>> etc.?
>> 
>
> I just installed 'red-eclipse' from a git checkout and then the link to
> the binary was named 'redeclipse_linux' and not 'red-eclipse' as I had
> expected.

First time I tried it, I expected just "redeclipse", but the upstream
doesn't provide this name for some reason, and as Andreas pointed we
don't modify the upstream choice without a good reason (although I think
it would be good to make a symlink here).  For example, we don't have
"cc" binary, or you can't do "loadkeys colemak" because we don't make
"colemak" link (the upstream calls this layout "en-latin9").

-- 
Alex