From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Install gpg2 as gpg Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:42:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87mvmohijq.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <20160613195538.GA1358@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCZdM-0006Zh-2Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:43:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCZdK-0001Lv-7A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:42:59 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:44448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCZdK-0001Iq-2X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:42:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160613195538.GA1358@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. > > If we do this, it will become impossible to install gnupg-1 and > gnupg-2.1 in the same profile, due to collisions of 'gpg' and 'gpgv' and > their man pages. There are no collisions without this change. Psh, that's what multiple profiles / guix environment are for, right? ;)