From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Update Git to 2.9.0 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:01:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvmhz39m.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEdI4-0002NZ-Na for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 10:01:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEdI1-0007B7-J3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 10:01:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:13:29 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > Git 2.9.0 has been released [0]. > > There is one notable change for us, commit 66948561 (commit-tree: do not > pay attention to commit.gpgsign) [1]. > > Apparently, it was never intended for the repo option commit.gpgSign to > apply to low-level "plumbing" commit operations such as those invoked by > `stash`, `rebase`, `filter-branch`, etc. > > So, `git stash` no longer invokes GPG. Sounds reasonable; =E2=80=98git commit=E2=80=99 still honors =E2=80=98commi= t.gpgsign=E2=80=99, right? > The commit text seems to imply that `git rebase` would no longer re-sign > commits, but that's not the case from my tests. OK. It would be bad if =E2=80=98git rebase=E2=80=99 would silently discard= signatures. Thanks for paying attention to this! Otherwise the updates LGTM! Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.