From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Add missing dependencies of Spamassassin Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:53:05 +0000 Message-ID: <87mvl1daji.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160728131932.0387fb87@scratchpost.org> <87h9ba564h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160728140233.6f9319a8@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSncX-0003fS-BR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:53:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSncW-0001qG-7v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:53:13 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:56774 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSncV-0001q7-UJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:53:12 -0400 Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 658679e2 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:53:10 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20160728140233.6f9319a8@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> Should I review v3 or v4? > > v4. I made a mistake in v3 - that's why it has a hole in the series - I didn't send it. > >> It would be easier if the patches would have references in one single thread, but I can work this way too. > > Huh, they should be a tree with the cover letter at the root now. Sorry, my mistake this should have been more precise: I meant to say: It can lead to confusion when there are several threads with different versions of the patches, including singles ones, not bundled, and bundled ones. I will start looking into these patches now, thanks. >>If this >> makes all the packages before obsolete I'll mark them as such and review >> only these versions. > > It does make all the "perl" packages (only perl) by me from before obsolete. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org