From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add p7zip. Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 20:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvjra2yq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87a8gwxa9c.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87y44f4plm.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <20ae08af155acdc7edd02b68afb9e66d@openmailbox.org> <20160808195835.GF18650@jasmine> <871t1y74fe.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87d1lheore.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87oa51puzr.fsf@openmailbox.org> <878tw5el71.fsf@elephly.net> <87k2floj6v.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r39hysdu.fsf@elephly.net> <87r39ge4pe.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87inumijn2.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87wpiwacrm.fsf@elephly.net> <874m5zipdq.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfWk0-0001Nf-Eh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:29:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfWju-000662-Fp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:29:31 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfWju-00065W-7V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:29:26 -0400 In-reply-to: <874m5zipdq.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Kei Kebreau writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>> Whoops, last patch was a bit messy and stacked on the previous one. This >>> patch should be better! >> >> I just wanted to push a slightly modified version of this (attached) but >> I cannot actually build the package. The patch to remove unused code >> does not apply due to different line endings. >> >> Could you please take a look at this again and make sure that the patch >> to the sources applies? >> >> ~~ Ricardo >> > I just tried it on my machine, and everything applied and built > correctly from a clean Guix tree. I don't exactly know how to proceed > From here. Perhaps a third party can try to build from the patch? The problem might be with the inline patch in the email. Don’t know. ~~ Ricardo