[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 8ee249d..4e2ecdb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -487,3 +487,56 @@ in the early 80's.  It was converted to C by Blake McBride and supports much of
 the InterLisp Standard.")
       (home-page "https://github.com/blakemcbride/LISPF4.git")
       (license license:expat))))
+
+(define-public femtolisp
+  (let* ((commit "68c5b1225572ecf2c52baf62f928063e5a30511b")
+        (revision "1"))
+    (package
+      (name "femtolisp")
+      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "-" (string-take commit 7)))
+      (source (origin
+                (method git-fetch)
+                (uri (git-reference
+                      (url "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp.git")
+                      (commit commit)))
+                (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
+                (sha256
+                 (base32
+                  "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
+      (build-system gnu-build-system)
+      (arguments
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
+         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+         #:phases
+         (modify-phases %standard-phases
+           (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
+           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
+           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
+           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
+           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
+             (lambda _
+               (substitute* "Makefile"
+                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
+               #t))
+           (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
+            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
+                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
+                (install-file "flisp" bin)
+                #t)))
+           ;; The flisp binary is now available, run bootstrap to
+           ;; generate flisp.boot and afterwards runs make test.
+           (add-after 'install 'bootstrap-gen-and-test
+             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
+                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
+                (and
+                 (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"))
+                 (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
+      (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
+      (description
+       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
+simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
+The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
+      (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
+      (license license:bsd-3))))
-- 
2.10.0

[PATCH 2/2] gnu: lispf4: Remove unused inputs key.

[ng0]

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (lispf4)[arguments]: Remove unused
inputs from 'install phase.
[source](file-name): Append -checkout to the file-name.
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 4e2ecdb..c5d8e5c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ interface.")
                 (uri (git-reference
                       (url "https://github.com/blakemcbride/LISPF4.git")
                       (commit commit)))
-                (file-name (string-append name "-" version))
+                (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
                 (sha256
                  (base32
                   "18k8kfn30za637y4bfbm9x3vv4psa3q8f7bi9h4h0qlb8rz8m92c"))))
@@ -463,14 +463,12 @@ interface.")
       (arguments
        `(#:make-flags
          '("-f" "Makefile.unx" "CC=gcc")
-         ;; no check phase
-         #:tests? #f
+         #:tests? #f ; No 'check phase
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure)
-           (replace
-            'install
-            (lambda* (#:key outputs inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+           (replace 'install
+            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
                      (bin (string-append out "/bin"))
                      (doc (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "doc")
-- 
2.10.0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp): New variable.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> index 8ee249d..4e2ecdb 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> @@ -487,3 +487,56 @@ in the early 80's.  It was converted to C by Blake McBride and supports much of
>  the InterLisp Standard.")
>        (home-page "https://github.com/blakemcbride/LISPF4.git")
>        (license license:expat))))
> +
> +(define-public femtolisp
> +  (let* ((commit "68c5b1225572ecf2c52baf62f928063e5a30511b")
> +        (revision "1"))
> +    (package
> +      (name "femtolisp")
> +      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "-" (string-take commit 7)))
> +      (source (origin
> +                (method git-fetch)
> +                (uri (git-reference
> +                      (url "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp.git")
> +                      (commit commit)))
> +                (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
> +                (sha256
> +                 (base32
> +                  "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
> +      (build-system gnu-build-system)
> +      (arguments
> +       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
> +         #:tests? #f ; No make check

But it does have a “test” target, no?  How about “#:test-target "test"”
instead of disabling the tests?

> +         #:phases
> +         (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +           (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
> +           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
> +           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
> +           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.

I find this strange.  More about this below.

> +           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
> +             (lambda _
> +               (substitute* "Makefile"
> +                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
> +               #t))

This may not be necessary when you pass “release” as one of the
“#:make-flags”.

> +           (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
> +            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
> +                (install-file "flisp" bin)
> +                #t)))
> +           ;; The flisp binary is now available, run bootstrap to
> +           ;; generate flisp.boot and afterwards runs make test.
> +           (add-after 'install 'bootstrap-gen-and-test
> +             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
> +                (and
> +                 (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"))
> +                 (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))

“install-file” has an unspecified return value.  I’m a little surprised
to see “bootstrap.sh” to be used *after* installation.  That’s very odd.
Could the tests not be fixed in another way, e.g. by overriding the
location of the binary?

> +      (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
> +      (description
> +       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
> +simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
> +The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")


“Scheme-like”.  I think the sentence on “lisp-1” can be removed, because
if it’s Scheme-like it’s unlikely to be a lisp-2.

> +      (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
> +      (license license:bsd-3))))

~~ Ricardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

Hi,

thanks for reviewing

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp): New variable.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> index 8ee249d..4e2ecdb 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> @@ -487,3 +487,56 @@ in the early 80's.  It was converted to C by Blake McBride and supports much of
>>  the InterLisp Standard.")
>>        (home-page "https://github.com/blakemcbride/LISPF4.git")
>>        (license license:expat))))
>> +
>> +(define-public femtolisp
>> +  (let* ((commit "68c5b1225572ecf2c52baf62f928063e5a30511b")
>> +        (revision "1"))
>> +    (package
>> +      (name "femtolisp")
>> +      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "-" (string-take commit 7)))
>> +      (source (origin
>> +                (method git-fetch)
>> +                (uri (git-reference
>> +                      (url "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp.git")
>> +                      (commit commit)))
>> +                (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
>> +                (sha256
>> +                 (base32
>> +                  "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
>> +      (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> +      (arguments
>> +       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
>> +         #:tests? #f ; No make check
>
> But it does have a “test” target, no?  How about “#:test-target "test"”
> instead of disabling the tests?

Ah ... sorry, I'll fix it again. I've seen this, but I've also worked on
40 other packages meanwhile.

>> +         #:phases
>> +         (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> +           (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
>> +           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
>> +           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
>> +           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
>
> I find this strange.  More about this below.
>
>> +           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
>> +             (lambda _
>> +               (substitute* "Makefile"
>> +                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
>> +               #t))
>
> This may not be necessary when you pass “release” as one of the
> “#:make-flags”.

I try it, maybe it works.

>> +           (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
>> +            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
>> +                (install-file "flisp" bin)
>> +                #t)))
>> +           ;; The flisp binary is now available, run bootstrap to
>> +           ;; generate flisp.boot and afterwards runs make test.
>> +           (add-after 'install 'bootstrap-gen-and-test
>> +             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
>> +                (and
>> +                 (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"))
>> +                 (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
>
> “install-file” has an unspecified return value.  I’m a little surprised
> to see “bootstrap.sh” to be used *after* installation.  That’s very odd.
> Could the tests not be fixed in another way, e.g. by overriding the
> location of the binary?

Okay, so I change it back to what this was before, without (and)?
On fixing it differently: No. If you can come up with a way to fix it
afterwards, you're welcome to fix it, I can't do this at the moment.

>> +      (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
>> +      (description
>> +       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
>> +simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
>> +The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
>
>
> “Scheme-like”.  I think the sentence on “lisp-1” can be removed, because
> if it’s Scheme-like it’s unlikely to be a lisp-2.

Okay, I don't know enough about scheme and lisp to comment that so I'll
just change it.

>> +      (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
>> +      (license license:bsd-3))))
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>

-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4098 bytes --]

I hope the appended patch still applies.

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp): New variable.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> index 8ee249d..4e2ecdb 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
>> @@ -487,3 +487,56 @@ in the early 80's.  It was converted to C by Blake McBride and supports much of
>>  the InterLisp Standard.")
>>        (home-page "https://github.com/blakemcbride/LISPF4.git")
>>        (license license:expat))))
>> +
>> +(define-public femtolisp
>> +  (let* ((commit "68c5b1225572ecf2c52baf62f928063e5a30511b")
>> +        (revision "1"))
>> +    (package
>> +      (name "femtolisp")
>> +      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "-" (string-take commit 7)))
>> +      (source (origin
>> +                (method git-fetch)
>> +                (uri (git-reference
>> +                      (url "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp.git")
>> +                      (commit commit)))
>> +                (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
>> +                (sha256
>> +                 (base32
>> +                  "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
>> +      (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> +      (arguments
>> +       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
>> +         #:tests? #f ; No make check
>
> But it does have a “test” target, no?  How about “#:test-target "test"”
> instead of disabling the tests?
>
>> +         #:phases
>> +         (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> +           (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
>> +           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
>> +           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
>> +           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
>
> I find this strange.  More about this below.
>
>> +           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
>> +             (lambda _
>> +               (substitute* "Makefile"
>> +                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
>> +               #t))
>
> This may not be necessary when you pass “release” as one of the
> “#:make-flags”.
>
>> +           (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
>> +            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
>> +                (install-file "flisp" bin)
>> +                #t)))
>> +           ;; The flisp binary is now available, run bootstrap to
>> +           ;; generate flisp.boot and afterwards runs make test.
>> +           (add-after 'install 'bootstrap-gen-and-test
>> +             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +              (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> +                     (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
>> +                (and
>> +                 (zero? (system* "./bootstrap.sh"))
>> +                 (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
>
> “install-file” has an unspecified return value.  I’m a little surprised
> to see “bootstrap.sh” to be used *after* installation.  That’s very odd.
> Could the tests not be fixed in another way, e.g. by overriding the
> location of the binary?
>
>> +      (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
>> +      (description
>> +       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
>> +simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
>> +The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
>
>
> “Scheme-like”.  I think the sentence on “lisp-1” can be removed, because
> if it’s Scheme-like it’s unlikely to be a lisp-2.
>
>> +      (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
>> +      (license license:bsd-3))))
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Adjust-description.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2768 bytes --]

From d4190191c58c454a4bcd626bf8009bcea896f2ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Adjust description.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[description]: Adjust to remove
unnecessary sentence.
[arguments](patch-makefile): Remove it and ...
(make-flags): Add "release" to make-flags.
(arguments)[tests]: Enable them as test-target "test".
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 21 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 3461de4..2816315 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -503,25 +503,16 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
-         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
+         #:test-target "test"
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
-           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
-           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
-           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
-           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
-             (lambda _
-               (substitute* "Makefile"
-                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
-               #t))
            (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
                      (bin (string-append out "/bin")))
-                (install-file "flisp" bin)
-                #t)))
+                (install-file "flisp" bin))))
            ;; The flisp binary is now available, run bootstrap to
            ;; generate flisp.boot and afterwards runs make test.
            (add-after 'install 'bootstrap-gen-and-test
@@ -533,8 +524,8 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                  (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
       (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
       (description
-       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
-simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
-The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
+       "@code{femtolisp} is a Scheme-like lisp implementation with a
+simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  The core is 12 builtin special forms
+and 33 builtin functions.")
       (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
       (license license:bsd-3))))
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 28 bytes --]



-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Hi,

> I hope the appended patch still applies.

could you please send a new, complete patch?

You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
accidentally.  The return value should be kept.

~~ Ricardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 300 bytes --]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>
> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>
> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
> accidentally.  The return value should be kept.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Adjust-description.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2399 bytes --]

From 7a58278178f7c13b1c9bfc93da4e5c8d765e59a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Adjust description.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[description]: Adjust to remove
unnecessary sentence.
[arguments](patch-makefile): Remove it and ...
(make-flags): Add "release" to make-flags.
(arguments)[tests]: Enable them as test-target "test".
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 3461de4..eb72b96 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -503,19 +503,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
-         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
+         #:test-target "test"
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
-           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
-           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
-           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
-           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
-             (lambda _
-               (substitute* "Makefile"
-                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
-               #t))
            (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
@@ -533,8 +525,8 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                  (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
       (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
       (description
-       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
-simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
-The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
+       "@code{femtolisp} is a Scheme-like lisp implementation with a
+simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  The core is 12 builtin special forms
+and 33 builtin functions.")
       (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
       (license license:bsd-3))))
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]


-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 452 bytes --]

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>>
>> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>>
>> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
>> accidentally.  The return value should be kept.
>>
>> ~~ Ricardo

Sorry, I'm not sure if I had sent the updated patch or not. The change
is so small.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Adjust-description.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2344 bytes --]

From 7a58278178f7c13b1c9bfc93da4e5c8d765e59a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Adjust description.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[description]: Adjust to remove
unnecessary sentence.
[arguments](patch-makefile): Remove it and ...
(make-flags): Add "release" to make-flags.
(arguments)[tests]: Enable them as test-target "test".
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 3461de4..eb72b96 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -503,19 +503,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
-         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
+         #:test-target "test"
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
-           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
-           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
-           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
-           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
-             (lambda _
-               (substitute* "Makefile"
-                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
-               #t))
            (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
@@ -533,8 +525,8 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                  (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
       (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
       (description
-       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
-simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
-The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
+       "@code{femtolisp} is a Scheme-like lisp implementation with a
+simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  The core is 12 builtin special forms
+and 33 builtin functions.")
       (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
       (license license:bsd-3))))
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 24 bytes --]



-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>>>
>>> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>>>
>>> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
>>> accidentally.  The return value should be kept.
>>>
>>> ~~ Ricardo
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure if I had sent the updated patch or not. The change
> is so small.

I’m sorry for the confusion.  Looking at the subject of these emails I
assumed that this patch was supposed to *add* a *new* package, not
modify an existing one.  I didn’t know that an earlier version had
already been pushed.

In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.

~~ Ricardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>>>>
>>>> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>>>>
>>>> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
>>>> accidentally.  The return value should be kept.
>>>>
>>>> ~~ Ricardo
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not sure if I had sent the updated patch or not. The change
>> is so small.
>
> I’m sorry for the confusion.  Looking at the subject of these emails I
> assumed that this patch was supposed to *add* a *new* package, not
> modify an existing one.  I didn’t know that an earlier version had
> already been pushed.

No problem.

> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
> related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.

Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?

> ~~ Ricardo
>
>

-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
>> related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
>> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.
>
> Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?

I just checked the git log but couldn’t find a similar package in which
changes of this magnitude were summarised in one commit.

I suggest splitting this up.  Actually, though, I think the description
doesn’t need changing.  I only suggested removing the sentence because I
assumed that the package didn’t yet exist.  There’s no harm in keeping
it.

Without the description change it’s really just one thing that has been
changed:

    gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.

    * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
      "patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
      target instead of "default".

What do you think?

~~ Ricardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
>>> related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
>>> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.
>>
>> Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?
>
> I just checked the git log but couldn’t find a similar package in which
> changes of this magnitude were summarised in one commit.
>
> I suggest splitting this up.  Actually, though, I think the description
> doesn’t need changing.  I only suggested removing the sentence because I
> assumed that the package didn’t yet exist.  There’s no harm in keeping
> it.
>
> Without the description change it’s really just one thing that has been
> changed:

Ah, you are right.

>     gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.
>
>     * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
>       "patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
>       target instead of "default".
>
> What do you think?
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>

I will send an updated patch in one or two hours, thanks.

-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.1: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Remove-custom-patch-makefile-phase.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2185 bytes --]

From 4061b7fb71a40591dd8e34ee147153aa0d1d9fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
"patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
target instead of "default".
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 3461de4..c7b8f35 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -503,19 +503,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
-         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
+         #:test-target "test"
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
-           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
-           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
-           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
-           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
-             (lambda _
-               (substitute* "Makefile"
-                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
-               #t))
            (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
@@ -533,7 +525,7 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                  (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
       (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
       (description
-       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
+       "@code{femtolisp} is a Scheme-like lisp implementation with a
 simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
 The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
       (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/plain, Size: 28 bytes --]



-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Andreas Enge]

Hello,

femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
   http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
with the message
In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
                 from string.c:16:
llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
 #  error "unknown architecture"

Should it be disabled there?

Andreas

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
> with the message
> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>                  from string.c:16:
> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>
> Should it be disabled there?

Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.

Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
>> with the message
>> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>>                  from string.c:16:
>> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>>
>> Should it be disabled there?
>
> Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
> supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.
>
> Ludo’.
>

Okay, I will fix it. In the meantime should the additional patch which
is unrelated to this change be applied.
-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ludovic Courtès]

ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>>
>>> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>>>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
>>> with the message
>>> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>>>                  from string.c:16:
>>> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>>>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>>>
>>> Should it be disabled there?
>>
>> Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
>> supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>>
>
> Okay, I will fix it. In the meantime should the additional patch which
> is unrelated to this change be applied.

Sorry, I’ll let whoever reviewed reply.  :-)

Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:
[…]
>> Okay, I will fix it. In the meantime should the additional patch which
>> is unrelated to this change be applied.
>
> Sorry, I’ll let whoever reviewed reply.  :-)

That would be me :)

I pushed the patch to remove the custom build phase.  It’s in master as
f7fe5f7a3e26676657265e98073b9914baf615f1.

~~ Ricardo

[PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
>> with the message
>> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>>                  from string.c:16:
>> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>>
>> Should it be disabled there?
>
> Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
> supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.

I'm not exactly sure what's supported, I found win32, osx, freebsd,
openbsd, and that's it.

> Ludo’.
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Remove-support-for-mips-and-armhf.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1598 bytes --]

From 6761e9ae928b590ea18f525cf941e06094fc12d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:08:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[supported-systems]: New field,
remove support for mips64el and armhf.
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index d1180a7..1b72fe2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Federico Beffa <beffa@fbengineering.ch>
-;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
+;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Andy Patterson <ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
@@ -501,6 +501,13 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                 (sha256
                  (base32
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
+      ;; armhf and mips64el fail to build, it has been reported upstream:
+      ;; https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp/issues/25
+      (supported-systems
+       (and
+        (delete "armhf-linux" %supported-systems)
+        (delete "mips64el-linux" %supported-systems)
+        #t))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
        `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]


-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

[Ludovic Courtès]

ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>>
>>> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>>>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
>>> with the message
>>> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>>>                  from string.c:16:
>>> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>>>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>>>
>>> Should it be disabled there?
>>
>> Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
>> supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.
>
> I'm not exactly sure what's supported, I found win32, osx, freebsd,
> openbsd, and that's it.

Sorry, I really meant supported architectures, which is what utils.h
seems to be about (although I don’t have the source here to check).
Could you check the #ifdefs in there?

> +      ;; armhf and mips64el fail to build, it has been reported upstream:
> +      ;; https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp/issues/25
> +      (supported-systems
> +       (and
> +        (delete "armhf-linux" %supported-systems)
> +        (delete "mips64el-linux" %supported-systems)
> +        #t))

‘supported-systems’ must be a list of strings, so:

  (fold delete %supported-systems
        '("armhf-linux" "mips64el-linux"))

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2143 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>>>
>>>> femtolisp fails on mips and arm:
>>>>    http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1472987/nixlog/2/tail-reload
>>>> with the message
>>>> In file included from llt/llt.h:6:0,
>>>>                  from string.c:16:
>>>> llt/utils.h:27:4: error: #error "unknown architecture"
>>>>  #  error "unknown architecture"
>>>>
>>>> Should it be disabled there?
>>>
>>> Definitely.  It would be worth checking in that file the set of
>>> supported architectures, and putting them in ‘supported-platforms’.
>>
>> I'm not exactly sure what's supported, I found win32, osx, freebsd,
>> openbsd, and that's it.
>
> Sorry, I really meant supported architectures, which is what utils.h
> seems to be about (although I don’t have the source here to check).
> Could you check the #ifdefs in there?

#if defined( __amd64__ ) || defined( _M_AMD64 )
#  define ARCH_X86_64
#  define __CPU__ 686
#elif defined( _M_IX86 )//msvs, intel, digital mars, watcom
#  if ! defined( __386__ )
#    error "unsupported target: 16-bit x86"
#  endif
#  define ARCH_X86
#  define __CPU__  ( _M_IX86 + 86 )
#elif defined( __i686__ )//gnu c
#  define ARCH_X86
#  define __CPU__ 686
#elif defined( __i586__ )//gnu c
#  define ARCH_X86
#  define __CPU__ 586
#elif defined( __i486__ )//gnu c
#  define ARCH_X86
#  define __CPU__ 486
#elif defined( __i386__ )//gnu c
#  define ARCH_X86
#  define __CPU__ 386
#else
#  error "unknown architecture"
#endif


>> +      ;; armhf and mips64el fail to build, it has been reported upstream:
>> +      ;; https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp/issues/25
>> +      (supported-systems
>> +       (and
>> +        (delete "armhf-linux" %supported-systems)
>> +        (delete "mips64el-linux" %supported-systems)
>> +        #t))
>
> ‘supported-systems’ must be a list of strings, so:
>
>   (fold delete %supported-systems
>         '("armhf-linux" "mips64el-linux"))
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>


[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Remove-support-for-mips-and-armhf.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1812 bytes --]

From 32c4d64ada9ab2573a00385b15b2b0a03a6fa44f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:08:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[supported-systems]: New field,
remove support for mips64el and armhf.
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index d1180a7..439433a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Federico Beffa <beffa@fbengineering.ch>
-;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
+;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Andy Patterson <ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@
   #:use-module (gnu packages ed)
   #:use-module (gnu packages m4)
   #:use-module (gnu packages version-control)
-  #:use-module (ice-9 match))
+  #:use-module (ice-9 match)
+  #:use-module (srfi srfi-1))
 
 (define-public gcl
   (package
@@ -501,6 +502,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                 (sha256
                  (base32
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
+      ;; See "utils.h" for supported systems. Upstream bug:
+      ;; https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp/issues/25
+      (supported-systems
+       (fold delete %supported-systems
+             '("armhf-linux" "mips64el-linux")))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
        `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]


-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 260 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:13:53AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove support for mips and armhf.
> 
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[supported-systems]: New field,
> remove support for mips64el and armhf.

Thanks, pushed!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> From 4061b7fb71a40591dd8e34ee147153aa0d1d9fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.
>
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
> "patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
> target instead of "default".
> ---
>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 14 +++-----------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> index 3461de4..c7b8f35 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> @@ -503,19 +503,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
>                    "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
>        (build-system gnu-build-system)
>        (arguments
> -       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
> -         #:tests? #f ; No make check
> +       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
> +         #:test-target "test"
>           #:phases
>           (modify-phases %standard-phases
>             (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
> -           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
> -           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
> -           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
> -           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
> -             (lambda _
> -               (substitute* "Makefile"
> -                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
> -               #t))
>             (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
>              (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>                (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
> @@ -533,7 +525,7 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
>                   (install-file "flisp.boot" bin))))))))
>        (synopsis "Scheme-like lisp implementation")
>        (description
> -       "@code{femtolisp} is a scheme-like lisp implementation with a
> +       "@code{femtolisp} is a Scheme-like lisp implementation with a

I just noticed this.. I need to send the patch again. Anyone up to
reviewing and applying it today so I can mark these threads as done?

>  simple, elegant Scheme dialect.  It is a lisp-1 with lexical scope.
>  The core is 12 builtin special forms and 33 builtin functions.")
>        (home-page "https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp")
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>
>

Andreas: I reported the failing builds upstream to get
conformation. https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolisp/issues/25


-- 
              ng0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 88 bytes --]

This patch fixes the mistake I had in the previous generation of it
(Scheme -> scheme)


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-femtolisp-Remove-custom-patch-makefile-phase.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1661 bytes --]

From 597f041ae43ddc85a466ef95a9d1b24c684925d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:19:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.

* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
"patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
target instead of "default".
---
 gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 3461de4..d1180a7 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -503,19 +503,11 @@ the InterLisp Standard.")
                   "04rnwllxnl86zw8c6pwxznn49bvkvh0f1lfliy085vjzvlq3rgja"))))
       (build-system gnu-build-system)
       (arguments
-       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc")
-         #:tests? #f ; No make check
+       `(#:make-flags '("CC=gcc" "release")
+         #:test-target "test"
          #:phases
          (modify-phases %standard-phases
            (delete 'configure) ; No configure script
-           ;; We have to remove the 'test phase because it requires
-           ;; the flisp binary to be present. Instead we run
-           ;; bootstrap.sh after the 'install phase.
-           (add-before 'build 'patch-makefile
-             (lambda _
-               (substitute* "Makefile"
-                 (("default: release test") "default: release"))
-               #t))
            (replace 'install ; Makefile has no 'install phase
             (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
               (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
-- 
2.10.0


[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 26 bytes --]


-- 
              ng0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]