From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYh-00030c-Kg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:22:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYg-00043M-89 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:22:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYg-00043G-4K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2jYf-0002A9-Sf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:22:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> From: Roel Janssen In-reply-to: <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:21:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvb5ligp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org Kei Kebreau writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Roel Janssen writes: >>> >>>> Marius Bakke writes: >>>> >>>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>>> >>>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> (define glib >>>>>> (package >>>>>> (name "glib") >>>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>>> (source (origin >>>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>>> (sha256 >>>>>> (base32 >>>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2")) >>>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l")) >>>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>>> >>>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything up >>>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>>> >>>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>>> >>>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >>> >>> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >>> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >>> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >>> see how it goes :) >> >> I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of >> 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. >> >> Kind regards, >> Roel Janssen > > Hi Roel, > > I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building > the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test > failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib > dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? > > Thanks in advance, > Kei Dear Kei, I think I have found what fixes the two failing tests.. I run the tests in parallel. When I disabled running them in parallel, two tests fail related to 'gdbus'. Kind regards, Roel Janssen