From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) Subject: Re: guile-dbi: Use libltdl and prefer GUILE_DBD_PATH. Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:02:44 +0800 Message-ID: <87mv8b44ob.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <87bn2yc3zu.fsf@member.fsf.org> <878ty06ze8.fsf@gnu.org> <8760t36it3.fsf@elisya.g.zucchetti.com> <87mvme8w8k.fsf@gnu.org> <87inx2inou.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87fus6mfbe.fsf@gnu.org> <878tush5wx.fsf_-_@member.fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Linas Vepstas's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:54:22 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "guile-user" To: Linas Vepstas Cc: Maurizio Boriani , guix-devel@gnu.org, Guile User List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org Linas Vepstas writes: > Sorry for the very late reply. I applied these patches to > > https://github.com/opencog/guile-dbi > > which will have to serve as the official repo for guile-dbi, since gna.org is now dead. Oh, thanks! Is there a plan for a new release with tarballs?