From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: bug#26339: closing bootloader serie. Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:52:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87mv4ddo43.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170402134916.2871-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <87d15rdtsb.fsf@gmail.com> <87d15rm5dl.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi8e1by3.fsf@gmail.com> <87she5hlwi.fsf@gnu.org> <87d159yftb.fsf@gmail.com> <871slpft5d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7zRC-00086P-LA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 03:52:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7zR9-0007Fr-KH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 03:52:18 -0400 In-reply-to: <871slpft5d.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > Does that make sense? Yes, it is now much clearer, thank you ! My qemu virtualized ARM machine has been compiling for a week now (is it normal to have so few substitutes btw ?) and is not over yet. So, I'm really interested by the --target on guix system. Do you happend to have a draft of your experiments :) ? Mathieu