From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34543) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epop5-0000Za-Qd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:26:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epop0-00060k-S3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:26:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epop0-00060Y-NT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epop0-00031F-Ha for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:26:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29820] [PATCH] services: cgit: Add more configuration fields. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <87incy9yv6.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8sdb6qa.fsf@lassieur.org> <87po6yu7h9.fsf@gmail.com> <871sjdz8ca.fsf@lassieur.org> <87r2q6zp2l.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8q6at2i.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 08:25:31 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87h8q6at2i.fsf@lassieur.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:03:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87muzxej3o.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 29820@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Cl=C3=A9ment, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: [...] >>>>> I think the official project uses 'cgit' instead of 'Cgit' (there are >>>>> other occurrences where you use 'Cgit'). >>>> >>>> Ludovic asked to capitalize cgit in >>>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28283#14 >>> >>> But he was only talking about titles wasn't he? >> >> I think not only, because we have Cgit everywhere in the current >> documentation. > > Then it should be changed to 'cgit', there is no need to copy > documentation mistakes :-). This is an example of commit from Ludovic > where he doesn't capitalize 'zlib': > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D06e3a5181efa0ea83= bb6608d3cbfba5caa56d7e9. OK. Also I see in cgit README [1], they use =E2=80=9Ccgit=E2=80=9D even in= titles. On the other hand it feels wrong to me, because it's a name of the program, like Guile, Guix, Linux or Emacs. It might be better to stick to that convention for readability (e.g. not =E2=80=98cgit=E2=80=99 as a co= mmand or a file name, but as a project name =E2=80=9CCgit=E2=80=9D). And because of w= e rename even configuration options like =E2=80=98scan-path=E2=80=99, it's OK to force the capitalization also. WDYT? [1] https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/tree/README Thanks, Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlqSSMsACgkQckbhHGm3 lWkw/Q/+Lf2kKODfm/PhoGsWvQKRZq3oLGNhr6hEiQHpQOZpacxIHulHm6pY2UOo epUtTCfzEmgD6S5tBlp8M9sGYqlre9uyxbPaiZyMt8FFj+cjnJWhYUjdLl1Lcjkr qnBAtW/YfXuJ++fO5y1uNkUqmkvDYcaWRY0MV+7hRGK+Z0CHDqf4ZLKJ9LUwd721 tUyKH6X96dYTG6EAnEpJqIYCgK03f4+ZHuoxUZghVSw/j2jR7Jz5V/zfrA11pk5s Ip7m202HkYySeyTo0yU43je5w5lMrGhv5QE6NuNaCsXJj67ujkxAI0eUF3fISt/2 LC+ashpqZ/DSdH7pQiA3dcYMo/Hz8hsWoeuS1vCuyhfqK4Lwc6EMRlsxMuKRqnsd +GnArb1iUvxqxfHQpa4xeDfTaLxtyNDFIE/2lQK2r4pIlOcSadSGqUVWXK6rC4pw +3Wtjl6QD94jNRaU1P9aljTEgD24er2piZ7ncaTEKe/THayJ/9Vqa7Pbbri7UFpk jpu7d+9VwS4FXuLxZskQUgjXgp5P0smcaKELqtUXWb09DOoKFGAfnrNw1SqdzkL6 mXE1/YHaC6hnuIaGRmFyw93UWHBiRGs7CUMnJ7IfiPwtWiUwI8obJDuyS0Yfd9Ow EZYRpffRPx7Vribf75jJOHOwE0F1R8tWuDNt/DQsT0m6CKraptA= =w+6S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--