From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrGs-00088B-2W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:15:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrGo-00066z-Tx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:15:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrGo-00066r-Q5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrGo-00054o-Lt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:15:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30274] [PATCH 00/21] gnu: Add licensecheck (license checker for source files). Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180128184437.32296-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87a7wxrdop.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaep9kg0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87o9kgkchr.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8q89e15.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vaemgv37.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvu68c74.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 05:14:17 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87tvu68c74.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 19:38:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87muztg8sm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30274-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 30274@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello Marius, Marius Bakke writes: > Oleg Pykhalov writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Sorry, I meant the opposite: we don't add the "v" prefix. It would be >>> nice to make the CPAN updater aware of that. >> >> I'll close current bug report. Should we open a new one for CPAN >> updater fix purpose? > > Sounds good! I think the GitHub updater already ignores the "v" prefix > when comparing versions, so there might be some inspiration there. OK, reported as 30641 Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlqWEHkACgkQckbhHGm3 lWkUexAAgJqKcO8ZJ0CR8lX9arI+kBkwSDtA8Xk0Hn4XkIZmHpj1Tbf2UVB+burM ++qXG0ARkGZO3mea20AXo1SeVjSrti01H8MRiA/L29IX1kghiz31tyZWlSW3zCVC Ipb6f1mTRJBwh97t1CHEzx3GfhSBjzPrlGwFhY7xC06mQJpdxKIWggfbHf3/jstH LGMN9HPfXXIb4bVjU9MsLxugmaxM7w3uYgkJl8K32455YYkFZjew3pZkqSc/H3yV khVv8LFFq4W8X22LhUMAqqabOkQQ67CBU/vnwFcHRjUlcMdMvTTemHhpDdWoboYF jX6fEobd014awWoRJgbWjpO8+F33mLljLH1xw/cHrXw3/o1AeGIVcDBcbAMEcWMu Cvgs1p+pwkQ++h+ggqCU54aCl+A00zC2m5G3cLqzdM02oLWv1U8GjBBB5i/MqW1R Qkl69g+XwpNiswqdvjJ9MvvC7JaTtl7Fnx6V5GJde76M9mVxmGVzaxk+JVf2BMY9 E3s+YgyWw6yyLsbQjkvcSGEkEBkY1P76iEGwso201EvLaLmLGp9tfsQdCEZAhEic ns8L8tXfnOYo3ZfuUOLmzOPnV7uxMxghiW/QoLUjMDPQBQXVIGhyU6MmbSQ+ICV9 6rGFVNf4jNESPdWu5WvuQWJSdkA26MBAPgo53hRO6CPJvBuVDXg= =RSDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--