From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41187)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gf9pa-0003cQ-Fy
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:43:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gf9pX-0003CW-Bx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:43:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55424)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gf9pW-0003CE-VV
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:43:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gf9pW-00088n-Ku
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:43:02 -0500
Subject: bug#33923: [PATCH] gnu: vboot-utils: Fix building on armhf-linux.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33923.D33923.154654813831240.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Kei Kebreau <kkebreau@posteo.net>
References: <20181230150459.19028-1-kkebreau@posteo.net>
	<20190103120746.2471a735@scratchpost.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:42:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20190103120746.2471a735@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:07:46 +0100")
Message-ID: <87muohjwwy.fsf@posteo.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 33923-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes:

> Hmm, OK, but why not use the newest release?  Apparently, there's
> release-R72-11316.B already.
>
> Although cmd_bdb seems to be still broken in the newer release.
> And so are the tests.
> And so is the workbuf test check.
>
> So your patch definitely LGTM as is!
>
> Additionally, the patches are not in upstream master, so it might make
> sense to send those to the them, so that we don't have to maintain the
> extra patches forever.

I've pushed the changes to master, and I'll see about sending the
patches upstream if Debian hasn't done that already. Thanks for reviewing!