From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#34427: [bug#34453] [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:06:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87mumvhg5u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190212091740.GB3284@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2UY-0005eT-Tq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:07:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2UY-0006XF-1U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:07:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2UX-0006Vv-SN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:07:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gv2UX-0003Bz-L2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:07:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190212091740.GB3284@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:17:40 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 34453@debbugs.gnu.org, 34427@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner skribis: > When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for > guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target > architecture. As discussed in , I would rather fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the problem. Ludo=E2=80=99.