From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brett Gilio Subject: bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:51:24 -0600 Message-ID: <87mumqhvcz.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20190220233151.GA23130@z.z> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwben-0007ny-Kb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:52:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbel-00023q-LQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:52:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbek-0001yl-Lz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:52:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbek-0004K9-Cc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:52:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <20190220233151.GA23130@z.z> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: mikadoZero Cc: 34597@debbugs.gnu.org mikadoZero writes: > After running `guix challenge` there are some packages which differ from ones I have built locally. Hi Mikado, Unless I am mistaken this isn't truly a reportable bug. As you can see in the guix challenge documentation https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-challenge.html the purpose of challenge is to check for deterministic qualities in reproducible packages. Right now, not all packages are reproducible as the guix team is hard at work trying to find the best solution for replacing binary seeds with something fully bootstrappable (see: https://bootstrappable.org) If you look, all of the packages you showed are related to the guix core system, which means that you are not getting any non-deterministic packages from the relevant /gnu package repositories, which is good. I think this bug can probably be closed. All the best, Brett Gilio