From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEZGw-0002px-1H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:57:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEZ4g-000101-BF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:45:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEZ4g-0000zx-6z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hEZ4g-00019a-2y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:45:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35223] [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Set DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES only where needed. Resent-Message-ID: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <20190410231936.15275-1-somebody@not-sent-or-endorsed-by.tobias.gr> <877ec022oc.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <877ec022oc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87mukwsodv.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 35223@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludo', Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice=20 > > skribis: > >> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice >> >> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (%default-extra-linux-options): Move=20 >> obsolete >> CONFIG_DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES option=E2=80=A6 >> (linux-libre-4.4): =E2=80=A6here. > > So =E2=80=9Cmake config=E2=80=9D was emitting a warning on kernels > 4.7,= right? Oh, maybe; no idea. I was tweaking my old kustom (pf-)kernel to be Guix-ready and=20 noticed that this option was missing. > As long as things still work after this patch, go for it! AFAICT: yes. Thanks! T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXK82jQAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eRM1AQDMIEddtdUqUypxJdNbawClPeSu0n8ifndw9Hp0QXxqtAD+OzIEINm42fpO N06J7UsCT72jwaz4umWES/gdXyK5FAI= =fQaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--