From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Guix beyond 1.0: =?utf-8?Q?let=E2=80=99s?= have a roadmap! Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 11:16:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87muhyt8rn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org> <87woh318wa.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhsQ3-00020y-3h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:16:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87woh318wa.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> (Giovanni Biscuolo's message of "Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:48:37 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello! Giovanni Biscuolo skribis: > * UI > > ** TODO: (local) web application to [re]configure a Guix System, possibly= starting > from an existing config file or user selectable templates > > To be clear: webUI should be *automatically* generated reading Guix > packages *and* Guix services to allow users to compose an > operating-system definition setting their preferred configuration > parameters (possibly with validation, but that should be **back > integrated** in Guix proper and _not_ hardcoded in the webUI) That makes sense to me! I think things like should benefit from declarative OS config as well as the ability to roll back. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.