From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should we make 'icu4c' identical between platforms?
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:11:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87mugu2vss.fsf@devup.no>
References: <87muh34l9h.fsf@devup.no> <87ftmv3wl4.fsf@devup.no>
 <878ssmplkm.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44224)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1hsoOH-0002we-TI
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:11:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1hsoOG-0003wT-Uy
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:11:37 -0400
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:45493)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1hsoOG-0003vl-Na
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:11:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878ssmplkm.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Hi Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> For now, I'm leaning towards adding the above substitution
>> unconditionally, and remove the "--with-data-packaging=3Darchive" flag, =
so
>> that ICU has the same bugs (and builds!) everywhere.
>>=20
>> Mark, WDYT?
>
> Sure, sounds good to me.

Done in f73fe13ccd1ef3fe6f6e0409fa817e5feb612e40.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl1Bk4MACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPpXiwf9E2jbHQ4o+pyQxln5WR02WJ/at45tFDJqreJgeziAfvukKlYGDyktqzNN
6+cUNF1PnmVLr1odFyiOyJX4Bk2xqoEr3vjWikUhZ0xcGBJNIuxuRLQfU6zN6kl6
Xl4dOezmjK9Gc5Gx7QNjAde3Fdon9n7jXZP7CdV1/bBdO4ksb2J0u8//vZTZJ6Ar
sJ4B5G4yQ7WwaYbkREYIVJPvtenP+JBB8XDAgqMUkHlYIFgzIbiDwst6g4PJID+a
16srYSZBcL0joqRURq2CA2ptFtgDi/tNk8aRWc1S8oUsuJZ81mugI/QyXdm4EVnw
2dLR4ZlFOL6bgkuZxMgm2T2obTH8iQ==
=tWcM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--